Here is the order in Navajo Nation v. San Juan County (D. Utah):
Navajo Nation v. San Juan County
New Materials in Navajo Nation v. San Juan County
Navajo Nation v. San Juan County Updated Materials
NYTs Profile of Indian Country Voting Rights Litigation
A must read!
Here is “For Native Americans, a ‘Historic Moment’ on the Path to Power at the Ballot Box.”
Special Master’s Final Report on Redistricting San Juan County
Here are the materials in the matter of Navajo Nation et al v. San Juan County et al, 12-cv-00039 (D. Utah):
Final Report of Bernard Grofman, Special Master
Link: Previous posts
Important Public Meeting Announcement in Navajo Nation v. San Juan County Case
Links: Public Meeting Announcement(PDF), previous posts
The court will hold public meetings in Monticello and Bluff to receive public input on proposed preliminary County Commission and School Board election districts.
Meeting Details:
Date: Thursday, November 16, 2017
Time: 10:30 am – 12:30 pm
Location: Hideout Community Center, 49 West 600 South St, Monticello, UT 84535
Date: Thursday, November 16, 2017
Time: 3:30 pm – 5:30 pm
Location: Bluff Community Center, 3rd East and Mulberry, Bluff Rd, Bluff, UT 84512
Special Master Appointment in Navajo Nation v. San Juan County
On September 29, 2017, the Court in Navajo Nation v. San Juan County issued an order appointing Dr. Bernard Grofman, University of California, Irvine, to serve as Special Master and oversee redistricting of the County’s School Board and Commission election districts (past and current districting plans were found to have violated the Equal Protection Clause in three previous decisions). The Court also ordered San Juan County to pay the costs associated with the Special Master process. The Court laid out a remedial redistricting process that will allow it to establish new remedial redistricting plans by December, 2017, in time for the 2018 election cycle.
Here:
Federal Court Rejects San Juan County Remedial Maps, Orders Appointment of Special Master
Here is the order in Navajo Nation v. San Juan County (D. Utah):
An excerpt:
For the reasons below, San Juan County’s remedial plans fail to pass constitutional muster. Specifically, the court concludes race was the predominant factor in the development of District 3 of the School Board plan and Districts 1 and 2 of the County Commission plan. The County’s consideration of race requires strict scrutiny analysis of these districts. The court concludes the County has failed to satisfy strict scrutiny and, therefore, these districts are unconstitutional. The court will not adopt the County’s plans.
Navajo Nation Prevails in Voting Rights Case against San Juan County
Here is the order in Navajo Nation v. San Juan County (D. Utah):
An excerpt:
The County’s redistricting decisions predominated by racial classifications violate the Equal Protection Clause because they are not narrowly tailored to serve a compelling governmental interest and cannot survive strict scrutiny. On this basis, Navajo Nation is entitled to summary judgment on its first claim for relief. San Juan County’s motion for summary judgment is denied on the merits to the extent that it addresses the Equal Protection claim asserted in the first claim for relief, and denied as moot to the extent it addresses any other theory that could support Navajo Nation’s first claim. Because San Juan County Commission District Three violates the Equal Protection Clause, the districts in the County must be redrawn.
Briefs here.
Navajo Nation’s Motion for Summary Judgment in Voting Rights Matter
Here is the pleading in Navajo Nation v. San Juan County (D. Utah):
You must be logged in to post a comment.