Here are some of the materials in Neal v. State of Arizona, an attempt to force Arizona to recognize the driver’s licenses and car registration of the fake “Pembina Band”:
Ninth Circuit
U.S. v. Has the Eagle — Ninth Circuit Affirms Murder Conviction
Here.
Ninth Circuit Affirms Wapato Heritage v. Evans — UPDATED
Here is today’s opinion. A related unpublished opinion disposing of other claims presumably will appear later in the day is here.
The briefs are here.
Lower court materials.
An excerpt detailing the issue:
Plaintiff-Appellant Wapato Heritage, L.L.C. (Wapato),appeals the district court’s order denying its motion for summary judgment and motion for reconsideration, and grantingDefendants-Appellees’ motion for summary judgment andmotion to dismiss. We address whether Wapato’spredecessor-in-interest, William Wapato Evans, Jr. (Evans),effectively exercised his option to renew a lease agreement(Lease) between Evans and certain Native American landowners (Landowners) covering real property known as MosesAllotment No. 8 (MA-8). The district court ruled that Evansdid not comply with the Lease’s requirements that he notifyall the Landowners that he intended to renew the Lease.Wapato, the current holder of all the Lessee’s rights under theLease, timely appealed.
Ninth Circuit Dismisses Bishop Community Land Claim against City of Los Angeles under Rule 19
Here is the opinion in Paiute-Shoshone Indians of the Bishop Community v. City of Los Angeles.
An excerpt:
Plaintiff Paiute-Shoshone Indians of the Bishop Community of the Bishop Colony, California, an Indian tribe formallyrecognized by the United States, filed this action againstDefendant City of Los Angeles for an order restoring Plaintiffto possession of land that the City took long ago in a deal withthe United States. The district court dismissed the actionunder Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(7) because itruled that, under Rule 19 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the United States was a required party that Plaintiffcould not join. The district court certified the appealability ofits order under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). Upon Plaintiff’s timelyrequest, we agreed to hear this interlocutory appeal, and we now affirm.
And the briefs:
Water Wheel v. LaRance Ninth Circuit Oral Argument Audio
Here.
Opening Ninth Circuit Brief in Yakama v. Gregoire — Indian Tax Case
Here: #14 Opening Brief of Plaintiff-Appellant
Lower court materials are here.
Updated Materials in Chehalis Tax Case
Ninth Circuit Briefing in Wapato Heritage LLC v. Evans
Here are the briefs:
Here are lower court materials in related cases.
Ninth Circuit Briefs in Katie John Subsistence Rights Appeal
Here are the materials in John v. United States:
State Amicus Brief — NM — WY — CO
Brief of Federal Appellees in John v US
Intervenors Response to Alaska
Lower court materials here.
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.