Here are the updated materials in Great American Life Insurance Company v. United States Department of the Interior (S.D. Ohio):
50 Great American Cross-Motion to Transfer
54 Great American Reply ISO 50
Prior posts here.
Way back in the day, Human Rights Watch issued a rare, tribe-facing report on the line of transactions that led to this case, which shows no signs of nearing a conclusion. The then-tribal government response is here.
Here are new pleadings in Great American Life Insurance Company v. United States Department of the Interior (S.D. Ohio):
Prior post here.
Here are the materials in Great American Life Insurance Company v. United States Department of the Interior (S.D. Ohio):
18 Notice of Additional Authority
We previously posted on this case here.
Human Rights Watch previously published a report on the doings at Lower Brule, here.
Here are materials in Great American Life Ins. Co. v. U.S. DOI, 16-cv-00699 ( S.D. Ohio):
Doc. 1 – Complaint for Declaratory, Injunctive, and Other Relief
Interior Board of Indian Appeals Order Affirming Decision
Updated Materials:
Here are the materials in United States v. Thacker (S.D. Ohio):
An excerpt:
Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty of knowingly selling and using for profit the human remains of a Native American.
Here are the materials in Great Elk Dancer for his Elk Nation v. Miller (S.D. Ohio):
G. had survived a motion to dismiss earlier, posted here.
Here are the materials in United States v. Beatty (S.D. Ohio):
Here are the materials in Great Elk Dancer for his Elk Nation v. Miller (S.D. Ohio):
An excerpt:
Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brings this civil rights action under 43 U.S.C. § 1983. In a nutshell, Plaintiff asserts Defendants arbitrarily and capriciously interfered with his business operations and targeted him for harassment because he is a Native American, thereby violating his federal constitutional rights. On August 19, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued a Second Initial Screening Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) in which he recommended that the Court allow this lawsuit to proceed against Defendants Mayor J. Martin Irvine, Fire Chief Brian Robertson, Officer Josh Mowery, and City Services Director Steve Shaw (collectively, “City Defendants”). R & R 11, ECF No. 17. He also recommended that the Court dismiss the remaining Defendants. Id. In addition, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court deny Defendants’ motions to strike Plaintiffs first amended complaint. Id. at 11 (denying ECF Nos. 9 & 13). The City Defendants filed timely objections to the R & R. ECF No. 19. The Court now considers those objections.
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.