Here are the materials in Sprint Communications Company L.P. v. Crow Creek Sioux Tribal Court (D. S.D.):
190 Native American Telecom Opposition
We have posted on this case before:
Here is that opinion:
Sprint v Native American Telecom — Denial of PI.
An excerpt:
Defendant, Native American Telecom (NAT), moves for a preliminary injunction to enjoin plaintiff, Sprint Communications Company, from withholding interstate switched access charges that NAT has already billed or will bill to Sprint in the future. Sprint resists the motion. The motion is denied.
Here are the materials in Sprint Communications v. Native American Telecom (D. S.D.):
Sprint Opposition to Motion for Stay
NAT Reply in Support of Motion to Stay
NAT Opposition to Motion for PI
Sprint Reply in Support of Motion for PI
An excerpt:
Turtle Talk 