Seneca Gaming Case Decided by DCT

The district court in CECGAC v. Hogen held that the NIGC’s determination that Seneca gaming at its Buffalo parcel was valid under the land claims settlement exception was arbitrary and capricious, because no extant Seneca land claim existed at the time of the time of the settlement.

Here are the briefs. Here is the opinion.

One thought on “Seneca Gaming Case Decided by DCT

Comments are closed.