Federal Court Allows Lacey Act Indictment of Fla. Seminole Member to Proceed [sale of alligator eggs]

Here are the materials in United States v. Turtle (M.D. Fla.):

1-criminal-information.pdf

38-motion-to-dismiss.pdf

43-us-response.pdf

52-dct-order.pdf

NYTs: “‘The Nation Has Stood Up’: Indigenous Clans in Canada Battle Pipeline Project”

Here.

Native Prisoners Win RLUIPA Trial in Texas

Here is the opinion in Goodman v. Davis (S.D. Tex.):

dkt-322-findings-of-fact-and-conclusions-of-law.pdf

D.C. Circuit Grants Hoopa Tribe Petition re: Klamath River Hydropower

Here is the opinion in Hoopa Valley Tribe v. FERC.

Briefs here.

The Conversation: “Historical lawsuit affirms Indigenous laws on par with Canada’s”

Here, by Prof. Darcy Lindberg.

Onondaga Nation Amicus Brief Opposing New York’s Nuclear Power Bailouts

Here is the brief:

cw-affirm12-14-18-z14104318-0001

The tribe’s description of the brief and of the issue is here:

In order to pretend that New York state has a progressive energy policy, Gov. Cuomo created his “clean energy plan”, that relies heavily on a multi-billion dollar bail out of the nuclear industry, including the 3 aging reactors in Oswego and a 4th near Rochester–all paid for by rate payers–including every electrical customer in the state.  Under this plan, and every household on the Nation pays extra every month for 12 years.

These extra payments collectively create a fund of $ 12 billion dollars that will be used to prop up the nuclear reactors, which otherwise cost too much to operate to compete against other energy sources.  Clearly this money should be used to build out more solar, wind and renewable energy generation.  

The sloop Clearwater [Pete Seager] has sued to stop this; and their lawyers  asked the Nation to file an Amicus/”friend of the court” appearance, to bring to the court the details of the harmful impacts of the nuclear industry on Indigenous peoples generally and the dangers created for the Nation and Haudenosaunee, by keeping the 3 Oswego reactors in operation for 12 more years. 

The Amicus is a very limited appearance in court, in which the issues important to the Nation and the Haudenosaunee can be raised, but no counterclaims could be filed back; and there is no waiver of sovereign immunity in such an appearance. The issues covered in the Nation’s papers are:

The horrible impacts on Indigenous peoples caused over decades of mining, milling, and transporting uranium;;

The inherent dangers of the 3 aging reactors and their decades of accumulated spent fuel rods at Oswego, which are the same flawed design as those at Fukushima;

The damages to Lake Ontario and its fish and other wildlife cause by these reactors, in violation of the Nation’s stewardship of its original territory and waters; and 

The dangers to the Nations, its citizens, waters, etc., from the transportation of nuclear wastes down Rt. 81, over the clear opposition of the Nation’s leaders.

The Nation was also joined in this Amicus by the Haudenosaunee Environmental Task Force and the American Indian Law Alliance.

Menominee Tribe Challenge to Back 40 Mine Dismissed

Here are the materials in Menominee Indian Tribe v. EPA (E.D. Wis.):

1 Complaint

7 EPA Motion to Dismiss

14 Aquila Motion to Intervene

21 Aquila Motion to Dismiss

21 Combined Response

22 Aquila Reply

23 EPA Reply

31 EPA Supplemental Brief

32 Aquila Supplemental Brief

33 Tribe Supplemental Brief

35 Tribe Motion to Amend Complaint

38 Aquila Opposition to Motion to Amend

39 EPA Opposition to Motion to Amend

40 Reply in Support of Motion to Amend

42 DCT Order

More materials on the mine here and here.

Environmental Law Institute Two-Part Podcast on Climate Change and Indigenous Traditional Ecological Knowledge

Here is Traditional Ecological Knowledge in the United States: Contributions to Climate Adaptation and Natural Resource Management (Part I).

Here is Traditional Ecological Knowledge and the Law: The Canadian Case (Part II).

 

Tenth Circuit Briefs in Caddo Nation of Oklahoma v. Wichita and Affiliated Tribes II

Here:

Appellant Brief

Response Brief

Reply

Case tag here.

Arizona SCT Rejects Hopi Challenge to Arizona Snowbowl

Here is the opinion in Hopi Tribe v. Arizona Snowbowl:

hopi-tribe-v-arizona-snowbowl.pdf

Prior posts here.