Spokane County Bar Association Indian Law Section/Gonzaga Law School Indian Law CLE — March 6, 2015

Here:

2015-03-06 – SCBA Indian Law Conference.Final

Judge Canby is the keynote speaker.

 

 

Narrangansett Indian Tribe Prevails in $5.7M Contract Dispute

Here is the decision in CGI-NIT, LLC v. Narragansett Indian Tribe (R.I. Super.):

Decision

An excerpt:

The Director of the Rhode Island Lottery, Gerald S. Aubin, testified compellingly, credibly and clearly that the Tribe does not participate in the operation of the state lottery in any fashion, he does not know Chief Sachem Thomas personally, the Tribe has no management role at all, nor has any advisory role. (Tr. 23-24.) As Mr. Aubin succinctly observed, “[t]here is no relationship whatsoever.” Id. at 24. Chief Sachem Thomas’s completely credible testimony reinforced this conclusion.

The relevant, material and believable testimonies of Mr. Aubin and Chief Sachem Thomas compel the conclusion that the conferral of the benefit of VLT revenue upon the Tribe was the unilateral act of our State’s legislature. The record is bereft of any evidence that any tribal member or representative initiated the discussion with the then-Governor for same, or lobbied for, or testified in support of such an enactment.

OAS to Resume Negotiations on the Draft American Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Feb. 9-11

Negotiations on the Organization of American States (OAS) draft American Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples will resume in 2015 following a three year hiatus.  The Fifteenth Meeting of Negotiations will take place next week at the OAS in Washington, DC, February 9-11, 2015.  

All indigenous peoples are invited to participate and offer textual proposals on the articles listed in the agenda.  Some of the articles under consideration at this meeting include Article XII (right to cultural identity and integrity), Article XVIII (healthy environment), Article XX (self-government), and Article XXI (indigenous law and jurisdiction). 

More information on the negotiation, including the agenda, can be found here:http://www.oas.org/en/sla/dil/indigenous_peoples_negotiation_XV_meeting_2015.asp

Registration to attend this negotiation can be completed here: https://www.oas.org/forms/TakeSurvey.aspx?SurveyID=ll0Mmo6

For more information or assistance in participating, contact Karla General at the Indian Law Resource Center at kgeneral@indianlaw.org.

National Survey of Tribal Court Systems Descriptive Brochures — Expect Surveys to Arrive in February 2015

NSTCS-AK Preview Brochure_7 11 14

NSTCS-CFR Preview Brochure_7 11 14

NSTCS-L48 Preview Brochure_12 18 14

Details from the DOJ: Continue reading

Third Amended Complaint and Answer in Stand Up For California v. Dept. of Interior

Here:

103 Third Amended Complaint

105 Interior Answer

Prior posts here, here, here, and here.

Unpublished California ICWA Notice Case

Here. When there are two tribes (Hoopa and Yurok in this case) mentioned, the state must notice both of them.

Such questions might have been resolved had the Department bothered to interview Richard concerning his Indian ancestry, as it had an affirmative duty to do. We will not rely on Richard’s representations when the Department manifestly failed to exercise due diligence and the record contains no communication from the Hoopa Valley Tribe regarding Richard’s membership or the children’s eligibility.

Who Won American Indian Law and Policy in 2014? The Tribal In-House Counsel Association (of course)

It pays to get organized. As you may know, MSU and TICA will be hosting the first Indian law conference (that I know) dedicated exclusively to issues involving in-house counsel for Indian nations. There’s still time to join TICA and answer the call for papers!

Runner Up

Tribal sovereign immunity — a huge winner in 2014, with the Supreme Court reaffirming its commitment to tribal immunity and to Congress’s prerogative when it comes to abrogating that immunity instead of the Supreme Court.

Final Four

Alaska Native tribes had a wild, up and down (mostly up) year. Justice Sotomayor continued her run of writing scholarly opinions in Supreme Court cases that articulated theories of Indian law rarely generated by Supreme Court Justices.

Fourth Round

Bay Mills Indian Community won a surprising Supreme Court victory — that victory could be said to be represented by three of the final eight (along with immunity and Justice Sotomayor). ICWA‘s omnipresence in terms of sheer number of cases, along with AG Holder’s statement of commitment to the enforcement of the statute, was a big deal this year. Judge Diane Humetewa became the first American Indian woman to sit as a federal judge. And crowd favorite 1491s advocacy against the Washington Football Team’s nickname raised their profile considerably.

Third Round

VAWA‘s tribal jurisdiction provisions being successfully implemented at the pilot project tribes, most notably Pascua Yaqui, and with Congress removing the Alaska exclusion, made the statute go fairly deep into the tournament. 2015 promises to be a much bigger year for VAWA. It was a pretty bad year for intra-tribal disputes, what with Chukchansi’s casino shutdown and armed unrest headlining all over. The Gun Lake Tribe‘s success in Congress, the Oneida Tribe of Wisconsin‘s success in the Supreme Court, and the Carcieri challengers‘ ongoing federal court efforts, all registered big this year. Two books made it this far, Structuring Sovereignty and the Cohen Handbook. But perhaps the biggest individual winner was Sarah Deer and her much-deserved award.

Second Round

Omaha Tribe, Cayuga Nation, Sault Tribe, and Lac Courte Oreilles all won important federal appellate victories. Indian country voting rights, Indian gaming, gray wolves, and tribal court exhaustion all had big litigation years. American Indian education, Bill Wood, Kevin Washburn, Frank Pommersheim, Keith Harper, Cobell settlement beneficiaries, the Supreme Court Project, and Adoptive Couple law reviews all burned out early.

First Round

Full of sound and fury but signifying nothing. Made the tournament field, and that means something, but that’s all: Tribal Law and Policy Institute, Native American Bar Association, Bay Mills law review articles, tribal sovereign (payday) lenders, Buena Vista Rancheria, Kialegee Tribal Town, Big Lagoon Rancheria, MHA Nation, Fond du Lac, Wind River, Cowlitz, Navajo, preemption, Rule 19, internet gaming, human trafficking, alternative energy, climate change, Indian criminal sentencing, Tribal General Welfare Exclusion Act, Kumeyaay Cultural Repatriation Committee, Dollar General, Neal Katyal, Eric Holder, McAllen Grace Brethren Church, Judge Canby, Chris Deschene, Rob Williams, Borough of Jim Thorpe, Indian country pot growers, Senate Committee on Indian Affairs, and the State of New Mexico.

Who Won Indian Law and Policy in 2014? First Round Bracket — 1 of 8

Alright, let’s try this.

In category 1, Indian nations, we’ll divide the bracket up into two, so you’ll be voting in four contests here. Four more later in the day. Let’s say you have until midnight eastern to vote.

***

#1 Alaska Native tribes

My overall number one seed, what with Congress repealing the Alaska exceptions from VAWA, Interior adopting a fee to trust rule, a big voting rights win, an important victory for tribal court jurisdiction, and another win on tribal governance matters. And perhaps the biggest is the Supreme Court’s denial of cert in Alaska v. Jewell, the subsistence hunting case. Alaska has Judge Voluck, too. The Alaska Supreme Court has been making things harder on the ICWA front however, here, here, and here, though perhaps the DOJ’s intervention in one case will make a difference, and the government’s effort to set the Alaska AG right is encouraging.

v.

# 16 Buena Vista Rancheria

The Buena Vista Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians made a splash in federal court this year, winning one in the Supreme Court (well, a denial of cert) and losing one in the D.C. Circuit.

# 8 Omaha Tribe

The Omaha Tribe won a huge victory in the Eighth Circuit, which affirmed Judge Richard “Hercules” Kopf’s decision rejecting Nebraska’s effort to have the tribe’s reservation declared disestablished.

v.

# 9 Kialegee Tribal Town

The tribe won a big decision in the Tenth Circuit over its dispute with Oklahoma on the Broken Arrow Casino. A beneficiary of the massive Bay Mills win in the Supreme Court.

# 4 Cayuga Indian Nation

Cayuga won a big sovereign immunity decision in the Second Circuit, another beneficiary of the Bay Mills win in the Supreme Court. It wasn’t all pretty though, as tribal leadership disputes spill out in federal and state forums.

v.

# 13 Big Lagoon Rancheria

One of the few tribes to make the list by not really winning anything in 2014; in fact, losing a biggie in the Ninth Circuit. But the court granted en banc review, and oral argument looked pretty good for tribal interests. We’ll see.

# 5 Resource tribes

Well, Interior announced that resource extraction royalties they collected reached over $1 Billion in a single year for the first time. But fracking is bad for the environment, the MHA Nation is overrun with corruption and human trafficking, and oil prices are down 33 percent. Hope they’re saving their money. Oh wait, they’re not. I guess this one is really about the MHA Nation, so let’s make that change now.

The real # 5, MHA Nation

v.

# 12 Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians

Perhaps the most immediate beneficiary of the Bay Mills win in the Supreme Court, which persuaded the State of Michigan to seek another route to fighting Sault Tribe’s Lansing casino proposal. But not before Sault Tribe proposed two huge off-reservation casinos. Oh yeah, they won a $74 million contract case, too. Pretty good year. Ok, that persuades me, Sault Tribe’s seeding just jumped from 12 to 2 and knocks down BMIC, who actually won a SCT case this year.

The real # 12, Oneida Indian Tribe of Wisconsin

They earned a huge cert denial in their long-running fight with the Village of Hobart. And they filed an important amicus brief in the Stockbridge-Munsee cert petition.

Words Into Action: The UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and Its Impact in the United States in 2014

Update on the UN Declaration by Karla General of the Indian Law Resource Center:

Words Into Action
By Karla General*

The UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and Its Impact in the United States in 2014

Four years ago, on December 16, 2010, when the United States issued its statement of support for the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, it joined the world community in welcoming a new era of human rights.

For the first time in the history of international human rights, indigenous peoples were seen as equals, entitled to all the rights guaranteed to all other human beings. Today, we commemorate the battles fought and won by this and previous generations to secure a permanent place for indigenous peoples in the world community.

Affirming Rights

When President Obama announced the United States’ support of the UN Declaration, he said, “what matters far more than words are actions to match those words.” This was a historic year of action for indigenous peoples in the United States. In September, the first World Conference on Indigenous Peoples made key decisions supported by 100 tribal nations in the United States to affirm the rights in the UN Declaration and take actions to put them into effect, including:

  • Initiating a process to create a permanent body in the UN system that will monitor and encourage implementation of the Declaration;
  • Considering options for a General Assembly decision to make it possible for tribal and other indigenous governments to participate in UN meetings on a permanent basis;
  • Intensifying efforts to end violence against indigenous women; and
  • Recognizing the importance of indigenous peoples’ sacred places.

The details of these decisions will be worked out by various UN bodies in the next 22 months, including the Human Rights Council. Importantly, just before the World Conference, the United States appointed Keith Harper as the United States Ambassador to the Human Rights Council. A citizen of the Cherokee Nation, Ambassador Harper will play a key role in putting the decisions of the Conference to work.

Aligning Actions and Policies

The United States does appear to be taking steps toward bringing its laws and policies in line with the UN Declaration. With legislative victories like passage of the Tribal General Welfare Exclusion Act and, most recently, the repeal of Section 910 of the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013 (VAWA), which excluded Alaska Native Villages from key protections, tribal nations are gaining good ground in protecting their economies and their citizens.

Administratively, agencies are revising their tribal consultation policies in keeping with Executive Order 13175 of 2000 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments) and the Presidential Memorandum of 2009 (Tribal Consultation). Some agencies reference the UN Declaration in their revised policies and, at least when dealing with sacred places, several agencies work together to promote some of the rights in the Declaration.

Accountability Matters

The United States was called to task on its human rights obligations in 2014 like no other year before. Treaty monitoring bodies reviewed its human rights record for compliance with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the International Convention on the Elimination All Forms of Racial Discrimination, and the Convention Against Torture.

In March, the Human Rights Committee expressed concern over the rate of domestic violence against American Indian and Alaska Native women in the United States and recommended full and effective implementation of VAWA, including measures to assist tribal nations. In August, the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination called on the United States to intensify its efforts to prevent and combat violence against Native women and to ensure all cases of violence are appropriately investigated and prosecuted. The United States was also reviewed by the Committee Against Torture in November, and will be subject to a more comprehensive review in 2015 during its second Universal Periodic Review. In October, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, during a follow-up hearing of the Jessica Lenahan case, noted little to no progress since its initial recommendations to the United States in 2011, and again called on the United States to address the legislative and structural causes of violence against women.

The United States has indeed come a long way to support indigenous rights since it first voted against the UN Declaration in 2007. Yet, in 2014, international human rights treaty bodies have identified several areas in need of improvement. Indigenous peoples know there are many more gaps in implementation and are working to realize certain rights in the UN Declaration. Following the World Conference, some indigenous leaders are proposing an Executive Order calling for the executive branch to review federal administrative laws and practices for consistency with the UN Declaration. Much work therefore remains in the coming years to bring federal laws and practices in line with international human rights standards, and to ensure words do become effective actions that bring lasting improvements to the well-being of tribal nations.

*Karla E. General (Mohawk) is a Staff Attorney with the Indian Law Resource Center in Washington, D.C. Her work supports the implementation of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the Center’s effort to end violence against indigenous women through the Safe Women, Strong Nations project.

###

About the Indian Law Resource Center

The Indian Law Resource Center is a non-profit law and advocacy organization established and directed by American Indians. The Center is based in Helena, Montana and also has an office in Washington, DC. The Center provides legal assistance without charge to Indian and Alaska Native nations who are working to protect their lands, resources, human rights, environment and cultural heritage. The Center’s principal goal is the preservation and well-being of Indian and other Native nations and tribes. For more information, please visit us online at www.indianlaw.org or www.facebook.com/indianlawresourcecenter.