Tag Archives: Stand Up for California! v. Dept. of Interior

Summary Judgment Motions in Stand Up v. Interior [Wilton Rancheria]

Here are the materials in Stand Up for California! v. Dept. of Interior (D.D.C.): 57 Motion to Supplement Record 59 Tribe Opposition 60 DOI Opposition 61 Reply 62 DCT Order Denying Motion to Supplement Record 70 Second Motion to Compel … Continue reading

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, fee to trust, IGRA, Indian gaming, Research | Tagged , , ,

Ninth Circuit Briefs in Stand Up for California! v. Dept. of Interior [No. 18-16830]

Here: Opening Brief North Fork Brief Federal Brief Reply Lower court materials here.

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, IGRA, Indian gaming, Research | Tagged , , , , ,

SCOTUS Denies Cert in Three Indian Law Matters

Here is yesterday’s order list. The Court denied cert in Harvey v. Ute Indian Tribe, Osage Wind LLC v. Osage Minerals Council, and Stand Up for California v. Dept. of Interior.

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, Research, Supreme Court | Tagged , , ,

Opposition Briefs in Stand Up For California v. Dept. of Interior

Here: North Fork Rancheria Opposition Brief US Opposition Brief UPDATE 12/12/18): Reply Cert petition here.

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, fee to trust, IGRA, Research, Supreme Court | Tagged , , , , , ,

Interior and North Fork Rancheria Prevail over Stand Up for California on Tribe’s Gaming Compact Procedures

Here are the materials in Stand Up for California! v. Dept.of Interior (E.D. Cal.): 28 sufc motion for stay 29 sufc motion for summary j 37 north fork rancheria motion for summary j 39 north fork opposition to 29 41 … Continue reading

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, IGRA, Indian gaming, Research | Tagged , , , ,

Stand Up For California v. Dept. of Interior Cert Petition

Here: sufc cert petition Questions presented: 1. This case presents the question whether the Secretary may conclude that a casino “would not be detrimental to the surrounding community” despite uncontroverted evidence the casino will have unmitigated detrimental impacts to the community. … Continue reading

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, fee to trust, IGRA, Indian gaming, Research, Supreme Court | Tagged , , , , , ,

Federal Court Rejects Challenge to Wilton Rancheria Trust Acquisition Made by Acting Interior Official

Here are the materials in Stand Up for California! v. Dept. of Interior (D.D.C.): 33 Stand Up Motion for Summary J 40 Interior Cross Motion 41 Wilton Rancheria Cross Motion 45 Stand Up Reply 49 Wilton Reply 50 Interior Reply … Continue reading

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, fee to trust, Indian gaming, Research | Tagged , , ,

D.C. Circuit Affirms Interior Trust Acquisition for North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians

Here is the opinion in Stand Up for California! v. Dept. of Interior: Stand Up Opinion Briefs here.

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, fee to trust, Indian gaming, Research | Tagged , , , ,

D.C. Circuit Briefs in Challenge to North Fork Rancheria Trust Acquisition

Here are the materials in Stand Up for California! v. Dept. of Interior: Picayune Rancheria Opening Brief Stand Up Opening Brief Federal Brief North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians Brief Picayune Reply Stand Up Reply Lower court materials here.

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, fee to trust, IGRA, Research | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Federal Court Rules in Favor of North Fork Rancheria in Gaming Conflict

Here are the materials in Stand Up for California v. Dept. of Interior (D.D.C.): 106-1-sufc-motion-for-summary-j 108-1-picayune-rancheria-motion-for-summary-j 111-1-north-fork-rancheria-motion-for-summary-j 112-1-us-motion-for-summary-j 115-sufc-reply 116-picayune-reply 121-north-fork-rancheria-reply 122-us-reply 169-dct-order Prior posts here, here, here, here, and here.

Posted in fee to trust, IGRA, Research | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment