Here is the order in Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Haaland (D.D.C.):
Briefs here.
Here is the order in Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Haaland (D.D.C.):
Briefs here.
Here are the new materials in Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Haaland (formerly Bernhardt, Zinke, etc.) (D.D.C.):
This case is on remand from the D.C. Circuit.
Here is the petition in Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Haaland:
Panel stage materials here.
Here is the opinion in Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Haaland.
Briefs here.
For commentary on legal analysis by reading the dictionary, see Joseph Kimball’s work on the Michigan Supreme Court’s use of dictionaries.
Here is the petition in Stand Up for California! v. Dept. of the Interior:
Question presented:
Whether the Secretary can acquire land in trust on behalf of Indians whose federal supervision was terminated by Congress.
Lower court materials here.
Here is the opinion.
An excerpt:
This appeal comes after a seven year effort by the Department of the Interior (“Department”) to acquire land in trust on behalf of the Wilton Rancheria (“Wilton” or “Tribe”) to build a casino. After the Department finalized the acquisition of a parcel of land in Elk Grove, California, Stand Up for California! (“Stand Up”), Patty Johnson, Joe Teixeira, and Lynn Wheat (collectively “Appellants”) sued the Department. They brought a litany of claims, including claims that the Department (1) impermissibly delegated the authority to make a final agency action to acquire the land to an official who could not wield this authority, (2) was barred from acquiring land in trust on behalf of Wilton’s members, and (3) failed to adhere to its National Environmental Protection Act obligations when it selected the Elk Grove location. Appellants and the Department cross moved for summary judgment, and the District Court granted the Department’s motions on all counts. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the District Court.
Briefs here.
Here are the materials in Comanche Nation of Oklahoma v. de la Vega [formerly Zinke, then Bernhardt, and now should be Haaland] (W.D. Okla.):
Here are the briefs (so far) in Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Bernhardt:
Nottawaseppi Huron Band Potawatomi + Saginaw Chippewa Brief
Lower court materials here.
Here is the complaint in State of Kansas v. Bernhardt (D. Kan.):
Here is the complaint in Cayuga Nation v. United States (D.D.C.):
You must be logged in to post a comment.