Class III Procedures

Federal Court (again) Rejects Stand Up’s Claims against Interior and North Fork Rancheria

Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Here are the materials in Stand Up for California! v. Dept. of Interior (E.D. Cal.):

73 SUFC MSJ

77-1 Interior MSJ

79 Tribe MSJ

80 SUFC Opposition

81 Interior Reply

81 Tribe Reply

89 DCT Order

Prior posts here and here.

SCOTUS Denies Cert in Club One Casino v. Haaland

Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Here is today’s order list.

Here are the cert stage briefs in Club One.

Club One Casino v. Bernhardt Cert Petition [North Fork Rancheria]

Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Here is the petition in Club One Casino Inc. v. Bernhardt:

Club One Petition for Writ of Certiorari

Appendix

Lower court materials here and here.

Update:

Brief in Opposition

Reply

Connecticut, Pequot, and Mohegan Allowed to Intervene and Assert Rule 19 Defense in MGM Challenge to Gaming Compacts

Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Here are the materials so far in MGM Resorts Global Development LLC v. Dept. of Interior (D.D.C.):

16 Interior Motion to Dismiss

24-1 State & Tribal Sovereigns Motion to Intervene

27 MGM Response to Motion to Dismiss

33 Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss

34 MGM Opposition to Motion to Intervene

36 Reply in Support of Motion to Intervene

38 DCT Order Granting Motion to Intervene

We posted the complaint here.

Ninth Circuit Rejects Two Challenges to North Fork Rancheria Gaming

Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Here is the opinion in Club One Casino, Inc. v. Bernhardt.

Briefs here.

And here is the opinion in Stand Up for California! v. Dept. of the Interior.

Briefs here.

Ninth Circuit Briefs in Stand Up for California! v. Dept. of Interior [No. 18-16830]

Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Here:

Opening Brief

North Fork Brief

Federal Brief

Reply

Lower court materials here.

Update:

CA9 decision

Federal Court Allows Pequots to Amend Complaint re: Improper Political Influence over Zinke in Gaming Compact Approval

Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Here are the new materials in State of Connecticut v. Dept. of Interior (D.D.C.):

60-1 Mashantucket Motion to File Amended Complaint

60-2 First Amended Complaint

62 Interior Opposition

63 MGM Opposition

65 Reply

66 Mashantucket Notice of Supplemental Authority

67 MGM Notice of Supplemental Authority

68 Interior Response to Notice

69 Plaintiffs Response to MGM Notice

70 Mashantucket Reply

72 DCT Order

Prior post here.

Federal Court Dismisses Connecticut & Mashantucket Pequot Claims re: Gaming Procedures

Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Here are the materials in State of Connecticut v. Zinke (D.D.C.):

1 Complaint

9 Plaintiffs MSJ

11-1 MGM Motion to Intervene

18 Interior Motion for Partial Dismiss

22 Interior Opposotion to 11

23 Plaintiffs Opposition to 11

27 Plaintiffs Oppositon to 18

29 MGM Reply in Support of 11

32 Interior Reply in Support of 18

51-1 Plaintiffs Supplemental Memorandum in Opposition to 18

55 Interior Response to 51

56 Plaintiffs Reply re 51

59 DCT Order

Interior and North Fork Rancheria Prevail over Stand Up for California on Tribe’s Gaming Compact Procedures

Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Here are the materials in Stand Up for California! v. Dept.of Interior (E.D. Cal.):

28 sufc motion for stay

29 sufc motion for summary j

37 north fork rancheria motion for summary j

39 north fork opposition to 29

41 interior motion for summary j

43 interior response to 29

44 reply in support of 29

46 sufc opposition to motions for summary j

51 north fork reply in support of 37

52 interior reply in support of 41

58 dct order