Here are the materials so far in MGM Resorts Global Development LLC v. Dept. of Interior (D.D.C.):
24-1 State & Tribal Sovereigns Motion to Intervene
27 MGM Response to Motion to Dismiss
33 Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss
34 MGM Opposition to Motion to Intervene
36 Reply in Support of Motion to Intervene
38 DCT Order Granting Motion to Intervene
We posted the complaint here.
Here is the complaint in MGM Resorts Global Development LLC v. Dept. of Interior (D.D.C.):
Here are the new materials in State of Connecticut v. Dept. of Interior (D.D.C.):
60-1 Mashantucket Motion to File Amended Complaint
66 Mashantucket Notice of Supplemental Authority
67 MGM Notice of Supplemental Authority
68 Interior Response to Notice
69 Plaintiffs Response to MGM Notice
Prior post here.
Here are the materials in Edwards v. Foxwoods Resort Casino (E.D. N.Y.):
Here are the materials in State of Connecticut v. Zinke (D.D.C.):
18 Interior Motion for Partial Dismiss
23 Plaintiffs Opposition to 11
32 Interior Reply in Support of 18
Here is the complaint in the matter of State of Connecticut et al v. Zinke et al, 17-cv-02564 (D.D.C. Nov. 29, 2017):
Doc. 1 – Civil Cover Sheet and Complaint
With the State of Connecticut, the Mohegan and Mashantucket Pequot Tribes have filed suit against the Secretary of Interior after the Department failed to treat submitted
amendments to their gaming compact as deemed approved and publish in the Federal Register notice that the amendments are deemed approved.
Here.
An excerpt:
Though Yoon won’t say if Weil is handling other Indian casino matters, there is likely be more such work for some work to snap up in the not-too-distant future. Moody’s downgraded its ratings on several Indian-owned casino bonds earlier this year, issuing a “probability of default” rating on $200 million worth of notes tied to a Sacramento casino operated by the Buena Vista band of the Me-Wuk Indian tribe and a similar warning on $300 million in notes connected to a Washington State casino operated by the Snoqualmie Tribe.
