Here is the opinion in Club One Casino, Inc. v. Bernhardt.
Briefs here.
And here is the opinion in Stand Up for California! v. Dept. of the Interior.
Briefs here.
North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians
Ninth Circuit Briefs in Club One Casino Inc. v. Dept. of Interior
Ninth Circuit Briefs in Stand Up for California! v. Dept. of Interior [No. 18-16830]
Ninth Circuit Briefs in Club One Casino v. Dept. of Interior [Challenge to IRA Section 5]
Opposition Briefs in Stand Up For California v. Dept. of Interior
Interior and North Fork Rancheria Prevail over Stand Up for California on Tribe’s Gaming Compact Procedures
Here are the materials in Stand Up for California! v. Dept.of Interior (E.D. Cal.):
37 north fork rancheria motion for summary j
39 north fork opposition to 29
41 interior motion for summary j
46 sufc opposition to motions for summary j
51 north fork reply in support of 37
Federal Court Rejects Constitutional Challenge to IRA Section 5 [fee to trust statute]
Here are the materials in Club One Casino v. Dept. of Interior (E.D. Cal.):
36-1 club one casino motion for summary j
Prior post here.
Stand Up For California v. Dept. of Interior Cert Petition
Here:
Questions presented:
1. This case presents the question whether the Secretary may conclude that a casino “would not be detrimental to the surrounding community” despite uncontroverted evidence the casino will have unmitigated detrimental impacts to the community.
2. This case presents the question whether multiple Indians residing on the same reservation are, per se, an “Indian tribe” irrespective of the individual Indians‘ tribal affiliations, if any.
Lower court materials here.
D.C. Circuit Affirms Interior Trust Acquisition for North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians
Federal Court Rejects Casino Opponent Demand to Supplement Administrative Record with Materials on the Legal Status of Trust Land (North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians)
Here are the materials in Club One Casino v. Dept. of Interior (E.D. Cal.):
