Supreme Court Takes No Action on Border Fence Case

Here is today’s order list, and commentary on El Paso v. Napolitano from SCOTUSblog:

The Court took no action on a new attempt to challenge the constitutionality of the sweeping powers Congress gave to the federal government in 2005 to set aside federal, state and local laws that may get in the way of building a 700-mile-long “secure fence” along the U.S.-Mexico border.  The Court turned down the first test, last June. The new case is El Paso County, et al., v. Napolitano (08-751).  The dispute could present the Court with an opportunity to make use of the rare power to strike down a federal law on the theory that Congress had given away too much of its legislative power to the Executive Branch.  That power has not been used for 74 years.

The cert petition is here. Ysleta del Sur Pueblo is a petitioner.

Border Fence Construction Cert Petition — Defenders of Wildlife v. Chertoff

The Tohono O’odham Nation joined an amicus brief supporting the cert petition in Defenders of Wildlife v. Chertoff (No. 07-1180) (amici-supporting-cert-petn-national-advocacy-center-et-al). The government has until May 18 to file a response. This is a potentially ground breaking case, given that the Department of Homeland Security has invoked a statute that allows the Department to ignore any law (especially environmental protection laws) that would delay the construction of the border fence (for analysis, see SCOTUSblog).

We’ve written about some aspects of this controversy earlier (here).

Border Fence Fiasco Builds

Here’s the link to the Office of Inspector General report about the Border Fence fiasco. It’s always the bad deals we make with non-Indians that kills us….

Here’s the text of Sen. Hillary Clinton’s demand for an investigation into the border fence contract awarded to Chenega Technology (h/t Indianz):

Continue reading