Reply brief for Petitioner here.
Previous briefs and materials posted here.
Contract Disputes Act of 1978
Menominee Indian Tribe v. United States Materials
Here are the briefs and other materials:
Merits Briefs
Amicus Briefs
Cert Stage Materials
Menominee Indian Tribe Cert Petition
Lower Court Materials
–D.C. Circuit
–DCT
DCT Order Dismissing Menominee Claims
Menominee Motion for Summary J
–D.C. Circuit (2010)
Respondents Brief in Menominee Indian Tribe v. United States
Federal Court Denies Government’s Motion to Dismiss Tuba City Regional’s Contract Support Costs Claims against IHS
Here are the materials in Tuba City Regional Health Care Corp. v. United States (D.D.C.):
32 DCT Order Denying US Motion to Dismiss
Federal Circuit Reinstates Vendor’s Claims against BIA over Educational Services
Here is the opinion in Engage Learning, Inc. v. Salazar.
Here is an excerpt:
Engage Learning, Inc. (“Engage”) appeals from a decision of the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals (“the Board”) dismissing its appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Board held that it did not have jurisdiction under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (“CDA”), 41 U.S.C. § 601 et seq., because Engage failed to establish that it had a contract with the government for the unpaid services. Engage Learning, Inc. v. Dep’t of the Interior, CBCA 1165 (June 15, 2010) (“Board Op.”). Because we conclude that the Board erred in dismissing the appeal on jurisdictional grounds, but could have dismissed in part for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, we affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand.
Turtle Talk 