News Coverage of Michigan v. EPA Case in Seventh Circuit

From the Chicago Tribune (via Traverse City):

TRAVERSE CITY, Mich. – A federal appeals court has ruled in favor of a Wisconsin-based Indian tribe in a 16-year dispute with the state of Michigan over air quality standards.

Michigan challenged the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency‘s decision in 2008 to grant the Forest County Potawatomi Community’s reservation the highest level of protection allowed under the federal Clean Air Act. EPA’s action followed fruitless negotiations between the tribe and the state dating from the early 1990s.

The 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the case Wednesday, saying the state lacked standing to contest the federal agency’s decision.

“This is a great victory,” said Philip Shopodock, chairman of the Potawatomi tribe. “Pure air and pure water are essential to our culture and our beliefs. We must protect our home for future generations.”

Continue reading

Forest County Potawatomi v. Town of Lincoln — Tax Case

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals reversed a trial court grant of summary judgment in favor of the Town of Lincoln in Forest County Potawatomi and Sokoagon Chippewa Community v. Town of Lincon (H/T Indianz). From the opinion:

The Forest County Potawatomi Community and the Sokaogon Chippewa Community (the Tribes) appeal a summary judgment dismissing their claim against the Township of Lincoln (the Town) for excessive tax on two forty-acre parcels in Crandon, Wisconsin. The Tribes challenged the assessed value of the land – land often referred to as the Crandon mine site. The assessment was based on a Department of Revenue analysis of an April 2003 sale of the mining company that owned the land. The circuit court concluded the sale was a recent arm’s-length sale of the property. The court declined to consider other factors the Tribes claimed affected the land’s value.

We conclude the sale of the mining company included not just the two forty-acre parcels but also substantial other land and company assets. The transaction was therefore not a sale of “the property.” We further conclude this is “significant contrary evidence,” which rebuts the presumption in favor of the
Town’s assessment. Accordingly, the circuit court erred by failing to consider the Tribes’ evidence of the land’s value. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.