Seminole Tribe v. Stranburg Cert Petition

Here:

Seminole Tribe v. Stranburg Cert Petition

Question presented:

Florida imposes a tax on gross receipts from utility services that are delivered to retail customers. Under express statutory authority, utility providers may separately itemize this utility tax on a customer’s bill and add it to the total charge for utility services. If the utility provider does so, the customer is legally required to remit the tax to the utility provider, which then transfers the payment to the State. Here, petitioner is a federally recognized Indian tribe that has purchased utility services delivered to tribal reservations. Petitioner’s utility providers have exercised their statutory right to separately itemize the utility tax when billing the Tribe for such services. 

The question presented is: 

When a utility provider exercises a state-law right to expressly pass on a utility tax to a federally recognized Indian tribe for utility services delivered to the tribe’s reservations and the tribe is therefore legally obligated to pay the tax, is the tax an impermissible
direct tax on the tribe?

Lower court materials here.

Flandreau Santee Sioux Prevails in Tax Dispute with South Dakota

Here is the order in Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe v. Gerlach (D. S.D.):

60 DCT Order

Briefs here.

Challenge to Wash. Dept. of Revenue Tax Assessment on Tribal Casino ATMs

Here is the complaint in Everi Payments Inc. v. State of Washington Dept. of Revenue (Super. Ct. — Thurston Cty.):

Complaint

Eleventh Circuit Briefs in Poarch Band of Creek Indians v. Hildreth

Here:

Hildreth Opening Brief

Poarch Band Brief

US Amicus Brief

Hildreth Reply

Lower court materials here.

Eleventh Circuit Briefs in Miccosukee Members’ Claims to Federal Tax Immunity

Here are the materials in Cypress v. United States:

Cypress Opening Brief

US Answer Brief

Lower court materials here:

1 Complaint

11 US Motion to Dismss

19 Opposition

22 US Reply

28 DCT Order

Eleventh Circuit Holds Florida’s Rental Tax is Preempted by Federal Indian Law, but Not Utility Tax

Here is the opinion in Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Stranburg. An excerpt:

Benjamin Franklin said, “[I]n this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes.” He was almost right. As this case illustrates, even taxes are not certain when it comes to matters affecting Indian tribes. In this appeal, we consider whether Florida’s Rental Tax and Florida’s Utility Tax, as applied to matters occurring on Seminole Tribe lands, violate the tenets of federal Indian law. For the reasons that follow, we find that the Utility Tax as it involves activities on Tribe land does not, but the Rental Tax does.

Briefs here.

Poarch Band Creek Sues Alabama Official over Taxes on Trust Property

Here is the complaint in Poarch Band of Creek Indians v. Hildreth (S.D. Ala.):

Complaint – filed copy

New Scholarship on Legal Incidence Doctrine in Indian Taxation Cases

David Y. Kwok has posted “Taxation Without Compensation as a Challenge for Tribal Sovereignty” on SSRN. The paper is forthcoming in the Mississippi Law Journal.

Here is the abstract:

For over 150 years federal courts have held that Indian tribes have immunity from state taxes based upon the sovereignty of tribal lands. The principle of land-based tax immunity, however, has proven difficult to apply in the context of commodity goods like gasoline and cigarettes, which can freely move across state and tribal borders. Should state residents be able to avoid state cigarette taxes by driving onto tribal lands to make purchases? The result has been decades of questionable yet high-stakes litigation between states and tribes over a tax’s “legal incidence,” a judicial fiction that ignores economic reality. I propose a two-part solution to the problem of commodity taxation that will reduce such litigation while also doing justice to both state and tribal interests. First, courts should employ a broad reading of the legal incidence test described in Wagnon v. Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation, 546 U.S. 95 (2005), so as to clearly establish a state’s right to apply nondiscriminatory commodity taxes to sales occurring on tribal lands. To offset the state’s broad taxation power, courts should expand tribal sovereignty beyond tax immunity to also include a tribe’s right to an equitable portion of those commodity tax revenues. The combination of these judicial choices will discourage ongoing litigation and promote equitable negotiated results between states and tribes regarding commodity taxes.

Quinault Moves to Dismiss Claims against Estate of Edward Comenout; Counterclaims Dismissed, Too

Here are the materials in Quinault Indian Nation v. Comenout (W.D. Wash.):

59 Quinault Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims

62 Opposition

67 Reply

72 DCT Order

SCOTUS Denies Cert in Yakama Indian Nation v. McKenna

Here is today’s order list.

The cert petition is here.