The 2011 Fourth Quarter in DOI Federal Press Releases

December, 2011

LEHAnncsTwoGamingDecisions122011PR

LEHNames AtkinsonIEEDDirPR

12-01-11 Tribal Consultation Policy Release kk

November, 2011

11-30-11 TRUST REFORM

Tribal Leasing Release

BlackNamesRiceOTSDepBurDir111811PR

October, 2011

10-27-11JOINT WH ONDCPASIADRGSSAFETY102711PR

FINALCobellRCDPR

LEHCongratsOJSRecipientsOfUSAGAward102011PR

Echo HawkStatementBaker102011FN

BlackNamesPintoNROD101911PR

Echo Hawk Statement 101711

LEHAnncsIEEDTechAsstGrantsTo30Tribes101111PR

LEHHaskellPrezPR10-7-11

Cobell6thConsultPRnd10-06-11

MooreNamesRoesselADD-N100311PR

Turtle Talk Poll: What Will Be the Impact of Pulling the 2008 Off-Rez Gaming Guidance Memo?

As Indianz reported, ASIA Larry Echo-Hawk has pulled the much-maligned 2008 guidance memo on off-reservation gaming. What impact will that decision have?

You may click on more than one. Clicking means you think “yes.” Not clicking means you think “no.”

Asst. Sec. Echo Hawk on a Congressional Carcieri Fix

An excerpt from his op-ed in Indian Country Today this afternoon:

The Carcieri decision, and the secretary’s authority to acquire lands in trust for all Indian tribes, touches the heart of the federal trust responsibility. Without a clear reaffirmation of the secretary’s trust acquisition authority, a number of tribes will be delayed in their efforts to restore their homelands: Lands that will be used for cultural purposes, housing, education, health care and economic development.

It is important that a Carcieri fix not be tied to the issue of gaming, which is just one activity that may occur on Indian lands. Only 30 of the more than 1,350 pending land-into-trust applications before the department are for gaming purposes. At the same time, it is also important that we acknowledge the role of Indian gaming in tribal economic development.

The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act establishes the framework for regulating this activity, and has become part of the bedrock of federal Indian law over the last quarter-century. Any efforts to fundamentally alter this important law should adhere to the traditional legislative process, and allow for the full participation of all affected tribes.

Such a process is consistent with President Obama’s commitment to transparent government, tribal consultation, and the nation-to-nation relationship between the United States and Indian tribes.

I strongly object to any process that deviates from those principles, and fundamentally amends a cornerstone of federal Indian law and policy without full tribal participation.