Here is the opinion.
State v. Bullplume — Mont. SCT Affirms Conviction for Blackfeet Reservation Murder
Here is the opinion.
Here is the opinion.
Here is the very interesting opinion in In the Matter of Not Afraid: Montana SCT Decision in In re Not Afraid.
The case is captioned In re Estate of Big Spring (Mont. S. Ct.). Here is the brief: Blackfeet Amicus Brief.
An excerpt from the brief:
This case comes before this Court on the appeal of the Appellants from the decision of the Ninth Judicial District of Glacier County which ruled against a Motion to Dismiss by the Appellants based on the lack of subject matter jurisdiction over the estate of William Big Spring, II, an enrolled member of the Blackfeet Tribe, who, at the time of his death was a resident of the Blackfeet Reservation and whose estate consisted of both trust and fee land solely within the exterior boundaries of the Blackfeet Reservation. The District Court stated that there was concurrent jurisdiction over this property and that the District Court was therefore the proper forum for the probate of this Indian-owned fee land.
Appellants argue that the State District Court is without jurisdiction over the probates of resident enrolled members of the Blackfeet Tribe. Appellants further state that the probate of the trust land of such persons is vested in the Administrative Courts of the United States and that the probate of the fee land is vested, exclusively in the Blackfeet Tribal Court. That is also the view of the Blackfeet Tribe as seen in this Amicus Brief.
Here are the materials in State v. James:
Interesting double jeopardy case, in that Montana law recognizes tribal court convictions for state double jeopardy purposes.
Here are the materials in Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. Montana Dept. of Environmental Quality:
Environmental Groups Revised Opening Brief
Fidelity Exploration Appellee Brief
The case is Morigeau v. Gorman and here are the materials:
The court held in In re J.J.L. that the trial court properly concluded that, in the adjudication of a child of a Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians who was not eligible for membership, ICWA does not apply.
Here are the materials:
The Montana Supreme Court upheld the lower court’s acceptance of testimony from an ICWA expert proferred by the state.
The question here is whether the Montana Supreme Court would invoke the doctrine of equitable tolling to toll the state statute of limitations where the plaintiff had first filed her tort claim in CSKT tribal court, then filed in state court. The court said yes, reversing a trial court order dismissing the claim.
The case is In re M.B. You can located the court’s opinion and the two appellate briefs on the Montana Supreme Court’s website here and searching for docket number 08-0443.
The question involved the adoptive placement rules of ICWA, in relation to children who were members of a state recognized tribe, the Little Shell Tribe of Chippewa Indians. The losing potential adoptive family did not raise the constitutional challenges until the appeal.