Here are updated orders in Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians v. Crosby (E.D. Cal.):
299-dct-order-dismissing-umpqua-bank
342-dct-order-dismissing-gdk-consulting
358-dct-order-granting-cornerstone-bank-motion
359-dct-order-denying-moore-insurance-motion
360-dct-order-denying-pi-motion
Recall the CA9 recently revived the tribe’s effort to freeze Crosby assets, post here.
Also, the federal indictment of the Crosby family is here.
Here is the unpublished opinion in Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians v. Crosby.
Briefs here.
The federal indictment of the Crosby family is here.
Here are the materials in Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians v. Crosby (E.D. Cal.):
45 Quicken Loans Motion to Dismiss
46 Umpqua Bank Motion to Dismiss
50-1 Cornerstone Motion to Dismiss
53-1 Associated Pension Motion to Dismiss
54-1 Garth Moore Insurance Motion to Dismiss
67 Plaintiffs Opposition to Motion to Stay
72-10 Plaintiffs Motion for PI
73 Plaintiffs Opposition to Motions to Dismiss
87 Crosby Opposition to Motion for PI
91 Plaintiffs Reply in Support of Motion for PI
Complaint here.
Here is the complaint in Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians v. Crosby (E.D. Cal.):
An excerpt:
Through this action the Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians (the “Tribe”), on behalf of its three hundred plus Tribal members, together with its principal business vehicle, the Paskenta Enterprises Corporation (“PEC”) seek to hold responsible a cadre of individuals who, over the course of approximately 17 years, took over control of the Tribal government and PEC. Through a concerted and systematic program of fraud, coercion, intimidation, extortion, bribery and deception, these individuals stole and otherwise diverted tens of millions dollars in Tribal money for their own personal benefit, as well as for those who substantially assisted them in this scheme.
News coverage here.
Turtle Talk 