Here is the opinion in Royalty Management Ins. Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue:

Here is the opinion in Royalty Management Ins. Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue:

Here are the materials in Richie v. United States (W.D. Okla.):
An excerpt:
The Court, therefore, finds that assisting, when requested, a local law enforcement agency in the enforcement or carrying out of the laws the agency enforces would be encompassed within the law enforcement services included in the Compact and the AFAs. The Court further finds that Eversole’s actions of responding to a Stroud officer’s request for assistance would be encompassed by the Compact and the AFAs.
Job announcement here.
Here.
The Sac and Fox Nation of Missouri in Kansas and Nebraska is proud to present the 14th annual Native Nations Law Symposium. The Symposium seeks to promote relations and education of important legal topics among all legal professionals both Tribal and State. Please see attached document for a copy of the tentative schedule (speakers may be subject to change).
Here is Walter Olson’s post “NAGPRA, Indian Burials, and the Unquiet Grave.”
Here is Elizabeth C. Varner, Diane Penneys Edelman and Leila Amineddoleh’s “NAGPRA and Congress’s Foresight.”
H/T Pechanga.
The Third Circuit materials are here (en banc petition pending).
Here:
ORDER (MCKEE, Chief and Circuit Judge) granting motions of the National Congress of the American Indians and Ben Nighthorse Campbell to file in support of the petition for rehearing. The Clerk is directed to file the briefs on the docket as statements in support of rehearing and circulate them to the full Court. No response by Appellant is required unless the court directs, filed. [13-2446, 13-2451] (TMK)
Here:
Petition for Rehearing (12-8-14)
NCAI Mtn for Leave and Proposed Brief in Support Filed 12-8-14
Senator Ben Nighthorse Campbell amicus brief
Senator Ben Nighthorse Campbell motion for leave to file amicus brief
UPDATE:
Borough Opposition to NCAI Amicus Brief
NCAI Reply in Support of Amicus Motion
Third Circuit panel materials here.
Here is the opinion in Thorpe v. Borough of Jim Thorpe:
Jim Thorpe Opinion [Update — the clerk has withdrawn this version of the opinion for quality control.]
An excerpt:
Thorpe’s remains are located at their final resting place and have not been disturbed. We find that applying NAGPRA to Thorpe’s burial in the Borough is such a clearly absurd result and so contrary to Congress’s intent to protect Native American burial sites that the Borough cannot be held to the requirements imposed on a museum under these circumstances. We reverse the District Court and hold that the Borough is not a “museum” under NAGPRA for the purposes of Thorpe’s burial.
Briefs here and here. Oral argument audio here.
Lower court materials here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.