Here are the materials in Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Biegalski (S.D. Fla.):
Southern District of Florida
Seminole Tribe Prevails in Tribal Court Exhaustion Matter
Here are the materials in Asker v. Seminole Tribe of Florida (S.D. Fla.):
Askar Seminole [DE 42] Def. Seminole Ct. Resp. in Opp. to M. to Vacate
Defendant’s, the Seminole Tribe of Florida Trial Court, Motion to Dismiss
Defendant’s, The Seminole Tribe of Florida Trial Court, Response in Opposition
Federal Court Won’t Allow Seminole to Try to Fight Tax on Remand from Eleventh Circuit
Here are the materials in Seminole Tribe of Florida v. State of Florida Dept. of Revenue (S.D. Fla.):
District Court Holds Miccosukee Member Liable for $278K in Taxes
Download materials in the matter of U.S. v. Jim et al, 14-cv-22441 (D. Fla. 8/24/16):
Doc. 185 – United States’ Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
Doc. 188 – Order Setting Forth Court’s Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
Link to previous posts about government’s tax dispute with Miccosukee Tribe here.
Federal Tort Claims Act against Seminole Police
Here is the complaint in Perez v. Seminole Tribe of Florida (S.D. Fla.):
Eleventh Circuit Holds Florida’s Rental Tax is Preempted by Federal Indian Law, but Not Utility Tax
Here is the opinion in Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Stranburg. An excerpt:
Benjamin Franklin said, “[I]n this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes.” He was almost right. As this case illustrates, even taxes are not certain when it comes to matters affecting Indian tribes. In this appeal, we consider whether Florida’s Rental Tax and Florida’s Utility Tax, as applied to matters occurring on Seminole Tribe lands, violate the tenets of federal Indian law. For the reasons that follow, we find that the Utility Tax as it involves activities on Tribe land does not, but the Rental Tax does.
Briefs here.
Eleventh Circuit Rejects Mikkosukee Effort to Avoid IRS Tax Subpoenas
Miccosukee Tribe Loses FOIA Request on Summary Judgment
Order here.
Although the FOIA favors the disclosure of government records for the good of the public, the DOJ has met its burden to show the OPR, OTJ, and EOUSA’s refusals to confirm or
deny the existence of the records the Tribe is seeking are justified under Exemptions 6 and 7(C).
Briefs:
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.