ICT Article on Local Support for Gun Lake Casino

Here is the article (h/t Pechanga). And an excerpt:

More than 15 entities, including Wayland Township, Allegan County, the Allegan Area Education Service Agency, the cities of Wayland and Allegan, the Barry County Chamber of Commerce, the Barry County Economic Development Alliance, the Gun Lake Business Association, and the Deputy Sheriff’s Association of Michigan have filed a collective amici curiae – friend of the court – brief in the petition for certiorari filed with the high court by the Interior Department and the Match-E-Nash-E-Wish Band of Pottawatomi (the Gun Lake Tribe) Indians versus David Patchak. The high court has been asked to review a ruling issued by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals last January that said Patchak, a former trustee in Wayland County, Michigan, has standing to bring a lawsuit against the Interior Department for taking into trust 147 acres in Bradley, Michigan, near Grand Rapids where the tribe operates its casino. The casino, which opened in February, created 900 new jobs and has brought a new wave of prosperity to local hotels, restaurants, vendors and other businesses in an area that had a reported 11.9 percent unemployment rate.

“Collectively, the amici curiae represent numerous individuals and businesses that support and have been positively affected by the Band’s economic development activities on the trust land. They submit this brief to explain the substantial local benefits that arise from the cooperative and mutually reinforcing economic development efforts of the Band, the regional governments, and local businesses,” the amici wrote. “The amici curiae urge this Court to grant the petitions for certiorari to resolve the debilitating uncertainty and economic instability created by the court of appeals’ decision, which threatens to stifle economic development in a state and region that has endured a disproportionate amount of economic suffering in recent years.”

Andrew Cohen: Turtle Talk SCT Preview in the Top 10

Here:

It’s the last Friday in September, just hours before the first Monday in October, which means you cannot swing a cat without hitting a preview of the coming Supreme Court term. I wrote one earlier this week. My esteemed colleague here at The AtlanticGarrett Epps, wrote a really good oneyesterday. And all throughout the universe of law and journalism, women and men of good cheer and business suits are chiming in from behind water glasses and paper name-cards to help explore and explain what the nine justices will be pondering over the next nine months.

Because I know you’ll itch to have something meaty to absorb while you are watching the start of the playoffs in baseball, or the excellent college football games Saturday afternoon, or the even better professional football games on Sunday, I figured I would save you the trouble of scouring through the InterWeb to find the best Supreme Court previews out there. My list of 10 is by no means complete. But it’s a good start and I hope you’ll feel free in the comments to suggest other previews which are worthwhile.

***

6. Regular readers of this space know that I try when I can to raise attention to Indian law issues, which almost never get the mainstream attention they often deserve. Here then fromTurtle Talk is a straightforward preview of the cases the justices could accept for review this term. Unfortunately, the High Court has a shameful record of blowing off Native American interests in the certiorari process.

NCAI Cert Stage Amicus Brief in Patchak Case

Here:

QL-sPBR1pnL

Details on Justice Sotomayor’s Visit to UNM Law and Jemez Pueblo

Here.

Local Units of Government and Business Groups File Amicus in Favor of Cert Petition in Gun Lake/Salazar v. Patchak

Here:

Wayland Twp Amicus Brief

See, I wasn’t joking when I said this here:

“Wayland and its surrounding townships long have hoped for more industry and economic growth – I know, I grew up there. So it’s just one guy for all we know who doesn’t want that. He’s pretty firmly in a tiny minority,” Fletcher said.

Tax Protesters Petition Opposing Native Hawaiians is SCOTUSBlog Petition of the Day

Seems odd to me, but maybe SCOTUSblog thinks of the Native Hawaiians and the State of Hawaii as a disfavored party in the Supreme Court.

Here:

Corboy v. Louie

Docket: 11-336 
Issue(s): (1) Whether petitioners have standing to seek a refund of their own taxes; and (2) whether the Equal Protection Clause precludes a state or municipality from creating tax exemptions that are available only to members of a certain race.

Certiorari stage documents:

Jeffrey Fisher on A Supreme Court Clinic’s Place in the Supreme Court Bar

Jeffrey Fisher has posted his paper, “A Supreme Court Clinic’s Place in the Supreme Court Bar” on SSRN. His clinic at Stanford had assisted the Navajo Nation and other tribes in filing a cert petition in Navajo Nation v. USFS, the San Francisco Peaks case.

Supreme Court Order List from Long Conference: No Oneida or Navajo Grants

Here is today’s order list. Next week, the Court will issue the order list of denials.

Presumably, that means United States v. New York, Oneida Indian Nation v. Oneida County, EEOC v. Peabody Western Coal Co., Navajo Nation v. EEOC, and Peabody Western Coal Co. v. EEOC have all been denied, although that won’t be confirmed until later.

Cert Opposition Brief in Gila River Indian Community v. Lyon

Here:

Lyon Cert Opposition Brief

The cert petition is here. The Indian Land Working Group Amicus brief is here.