Federal Court Refuses to Stay Order to Remove Pipeline

Here are the materials in Davilla v. Enable Midstream Partners LP (W.D. Okla.):

72 motion for stay

73 response

74 reply

2018-03-21 – dkt 092 – order denying defendants’ motion to stay permanent injunction

Prior posts here.

Comanche Effort to Shut Down Chickasaw Casino Fails for Now

Here are the materials in Comanche Nation of Oklahoma v. Zinke  (W.D. Okla.):

13-1 Motion for PI

20 Response

26 Reply

33 DCT Order

Materials in Cherokee Nation Trust Breach Claims against Interior

Here are the materials so far in Cherokee Nation v. Dept. of Interior (W.D. Okla.):

1 Complaint

51-1 Motion to Dismiss

55 Cherokee Motion to Strike Exhibits

58 US Response to Motion to Strike

59 Cherokee Reply in Support of Motion to Strike

63 Cherokee Response to Motion to Dismiss

Kialegee Tribal Town Sues over Raid by Muscogee (Creek) Lighthorsemen

Here is the complaint in Kialegee Tribal Town v. Dellinger (N.D. Okla.):

2 Complaint

Federal Court Awards $103K in Attorney Fees to Defendants in Allotment Condemnation Action

Here are the materials in Enable Oklahoma Intrastate Transmission LLC v. 25 Foot Wide Easement (W.D. Okla.):

57-1 Motion for Attorney Fees

60 Response

61 Reply

81 DCT Order

Prior post here.

Federal Court Remands Fracking Earthquake Suit against Oil Companies to State Court; Remand Order Turned on Meaning of “Tribal Lands”

Here are the materials in Adams v. Eagle Road Oil LLC (N.D. Okla.):

12 Cummings Motion to Dismiss

19 Eagle Road Motion to Dismiss

27 Adams Motion to Remand

33 Cummings Opposition to Remand Motion

36 Adams Reply

37 DCT Order Granting Motion to Remand

Okla. Federal Court Permanently Enjoins Pipeline from Operating on Indian Allotment

Here is the order in Davilla v. Enable Midstream Partners (W.D. Okla.):

56 DCT Order

Prior posts here and here.

Update in Suit against Pipeline Company in Kiowa Country

Here are the materials in Davilla v. Enable Midstream Partners (W.D. Okla.):

14-davilla-motion-to-dismiss-counterclaim

25-emp-response-to-14

28-davilla-reply-in-support-of-14

31-emp-motion-on-damages-and-rules-of-decision

32-davilla-motion-for-summary-j-on-liability

36-emp-response-to-32

37-davilla-response-to-31

38-davilla-reply-in-support-of-32

39-emp-reply-in-support-of-31

51-dct-order-on-31

Prior post here.

Peggy Fontenot Challenge to Oklahoma Art Sales Act

Here is the complaint in Fontenot v. Pruitt (W.D. Okla.):

1 Complaint

Tribal Lender Immune from Telephone Consumer Protection Act Suit

Here are the materials in Finn v. Great Plains Lending LLC (W.D. Okla.):

15 Motion to Dismiss

16 Response

18 Reply

DCT Order