Federal Court Decides Cross-Motions for Summary J in Wyandotte Nation v. Salazar

Here are the materials:

DCT Order on Cross Motions

Wyandotte Motion for Summary J

Interior Opposition

Kansas Opposition

An excerpt:

Plaintiff Wyandotte Nation, a federally recognized Indian tribe (“the Nation”), filed this lawsuit against Kenneth Salazar, Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior (“the Secretary”), seeking an order from this Court compelling the Secretary to accept title to certain land and hold it in trust for the Nation’s benefit, as specifically required by Public Law 98-602, 98 Stat. 3149 (1984) (“P.L. 98-602”), under both the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 706(a) and the Mandamus Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1361. The State of Kansas (“the State”) was permitted to intervene as of right under Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(a).1 This matter is before the Court on the Nation’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 60) and the Secretary and State’s cross-motions for summary judgment (Docs. 66, 69). The Court heard oral arguments on March 14, 2013, at which time the Secretary was directed to supplement the Administrative Record and the matter was taken under advisement. For the reasons explained in detail below, the Court denies the Nation’s motion and grants in part and denies in part the Secretary and the State’s cross- motions, retaining jurisdiction over the case until the agency issues a final decision on the Nation’s pending land-into-trust application.

Prior posts on this case here, here, and here.

 

Federal Court Dismisses Kansas’ Claims in Wyandotte Nation v. Salazar

Here are the recent materials:

DCT Order Dismissing Kansas’ Claims

Interior Supplemental Brief

Kansas Supplemental Brief

Previous materials are here and here and here and here.

Update in Wyandotte v. Salazar (& Kansas)

Here are updated materials, with the district court now asking the parties to brief in the import of the Patchak decision:

Interior Motion to Dismiss Kansas Cross Claims

Kansas Opposition to Interior Motion

Interior Reply

Wyandotte Motion to Dismiss Kansas Cross Claims

Kansas Opposition to Wyandotte Motion

Wyandotte Reply

DCT Order re Patchak Supp Briefing

Our prior posts on this case are here and here and here.

Federal Court Grants Kansas Motion to Intervene in Wyandotte v. Salazar Gaming Case

Here is that order:

DCT Order Granting Kansas Motion to Intervene

The complaint is here.

The D.C. District Court previously granted the US motion to transfer the venue to the District of Kansas:

DCT Order Granting US Motion to Transfer Venue to D. Kan.