Here is the order in Channing v. Seneca-Cayuga Nation (N.D. Okla.):
Prior post here.


| Dear Students: We hope your fall semester is off to a great start! Whether this is the first summer of your law school career or your third, we are very proud of the work that you all are doing and are looking forward to supporting you this year. To kick things off, we are now accepting resumes to be included in the 2024 National NALSA Resume Book. This is a great opportunity to get your resume into the hands of potential employers and get your name out there. We intend to distribute the book at Cutting Sign this October. Please submit a resume and cover letter using the form here: bit.ly/NALSAResumeBook. Submissions are due Friday, September 20th. Any questions about this can be directed to our Career Committee Chair, Sarah Zephier at area7@nationalnalsa.org As always, feel free to reach out to your area representative with any general questions that you might have. Thank you and enjoy the beginning of the school year! Best wishes, Jasmine Neosh. Public Relations Director, National NALSA 2024-25 |
Here is the document titled “CMA Apology to Indigenous Peoples: Historical and Ethical Review Report:
Here is the opinion in Hoffman v. Hollow Horn.

Here is the opinion in Royalty Management Ins. Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue:

Samuel Winder has published “Trial By Ambush: The Prosecution of Indians in Federal Court” in the Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review. PDF
Here is the abstract:
This Article addresses the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure’s unjust impact in the prosecution of Indians in federal court. As the rules of engagement used by federal prosecutors and defense attorneys in federal court when prosecuting Indians under the Major Crimes Act and the General Crimes Act, the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure differ from those of Civil Procedure with regard to discovery procedures. Specifically, the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure are unjust because they do not allow defense attorneys to conduct pretrial interviews or depositions of prospective witnesses whose evidence the United States will introduce at trial or use in the process of plea negotiations. Pretrial interviews and depositions prevent a party from being caught by surprise or ambushed in federal court.
Unlike federal courts, several tribes in New Mexico provide the mechanism for conducting pretrial interviews of trial witnesses. New Mexico state courts require pretrial interviews. New Mexico’s criminal procedural rules are similar to the procedural rules in Florida state courts. The states of Indiana, Missouri, and Vermont require depositions in criminal proceedings. In addition, military courts require depositions.
Indians were not involved in the enactment of the Major Crimes Act or the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, which have had a significant impact on the lives of Indians, both victims and defendants. This Article argues that the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure should be modified to require pretrial interviews or depositions to ensure that Indians prosecuted in federal court are not unjustly ambushed.

Link to YouTube livestream here. Panelists are Lauren van Schilfgaard and Fletcher.
Hosted by the Vermont Law Review, this symposium will focus on legal challenges and innovative solutions to protect our most vulnerable population: children. It will be held as a four-part lunch series beginning on Thursday, September 19.
The first installment will focus on the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). The discussion will explore the impact of recent Supreme Court decisions on ICWA and its long-term implications for Native American children and tribal sovereignty.
If you’re unable to join us in person on the VLGS campus, a livestream will also be available. You can access the livestream via the button below or by clicking here.

Here.

Kelly Church & Cherish Parrish: In Our Words, An Intergenerational Dialogue is a major exhibition that centers the subjectivities of two contemporary Indigenous artists whose practices have sustained and bolstered the relevance of the age-old Anishinaabe practice of black ash basket-making in the 21st century. The exhibition highlights the significance of community-based conversations between mother and daughter, and their ongoing conversations with elders (ancestors), young folx, and future generations as vital aspects of their methodology. These conversations often take place during basket gatherings — where community members come together and share stories and teachings that can encompass Anishinaabe creation stories, as well as those of survivance and resilience, to inform the materiality and liveness of their work. The curatorial and interpretive framework of this exhibition contends that the deeply situated and temporal works by Church (Stamps, BFA 1998) and Parrish (LSA, BA 2020) are repositories for Anishinaabe ways of knowing, thinking, and making that contribute to the complexity of American art and its histories. The expansive and bold practices of Church and Parrish affirm the sovereignty of Anishinaabe lifeways and the importance of including Indigenous narratives that have systematically been left out. Thus, the thematic survey of their work will explore the under-examined themes that inform their work such as Native women’s labor as carriers of culture and knowledge-keepers, the legacy of boarding schools and ancestors who walked on, the treaties in Michigan and the long-overlooked legacy of Anishinaabe intellectual life and their relevance today. Just like the practice of weaving and interlacing distinct strips of black ash to create one whole, Church and Parrish will address the diverse and interconnected themes with approximately 30 – 35 works, including 15 – 17 new works. Together, the exhibition offers an incisive critique of the colonial, racist paradigm of systemic erasure and assimilation that continues to this day, with the ongoing crises of missing and murdered Indigenous women, culture wars, and climate change that threaten Indigenous ways of living, sustenance, and making.
Curated by Srimoyee Mitra with Curatorial Assistant Zoi Crampton.
Here.
Kate and Leah speak with Rebecca Nagle, author of By the Fire We Carry: The Generations-Long Fight for Justice on Native Land about the battlefield that is federal Indian law.

You must be logged in to post a comment.