Indian Country Law Enforcement and Cooperative Public Safety Agreements
Michigan Bar Journal, Vol. 89, p. 42, February 2010, MSU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-02
Matthew L. M. Fletcher , Kathryn Fort and Wenona Singel
Scholarship
Aliza Organick on Tribal Law and Best Practices in Legal Education
Aliza Organick has posted her article, “Tribal Law and Best Practices in Legal Education: Creating a New Path for the Study of Tribal Law,” on SSRN. The article appears in a recent issue of the Kansas Journal of Law and Public Policy.
Here is the abstract:
Teaching culture in the law school classroom is enormously challenging. Teaching culture to law students in a clinical setting poses additional challenges in that we are not solely teaching the theoretical components of cultural competency, we are asking students to put them into practice. Law schools currently do not provide an effective framework for students to do this. By introducing tribal law into the curriculum, law schools begin the process of introducing students to the cultural component of legal theory and practice in culturally distinct communities. Law schools can begin this process by teaching the three-sovereign system endorsed by Justice O’Connor. In addition law schools should consider ways to provide a cross-cultural practice opportunity such as practice in tribal communities. Best practices provide a framework for developing an overall methodology for creating an institutional model that supports inclusion of this topic across the curriculum. This article explores the importance of introducing law students to tribal law and the culture of other local legal systems early and often, identifies key components of best practices that establish a framework for teaching culture in general and for teaching it alongside tribal law in particular, and finally identifies a few teaching techniques that may be helpful to those interested in trying cultural education.
Prof. Fletcher to Deliver USD Dillon Lecture
From the Sioux City Journal:
USD Dillon Lecture to Address Indian Law
By Nick Hytrek Journal staff writer | Posted: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 10:00 am |
VERMILLION, S.D. — Michigan State University law professor Matthew L.M. Fletcher will present the University of South Dakota’s annual Dillon Lecture, “Rebooting Indian Law in the Supreme Court.”
Fletcher’s lecture is set for 7 p.m. Feb. 18 in the law school courtroom.
In addition to teaching courses on Indian law, Fletcher sits as an appellate judge for various tribes.
The Dillon Lecture is being presented in conjunction with the South Dakota Law Review Symposium, scheduled for 10 a.m. Feb. 18 in the law school courtroom. In addition to the symposium, USD’s Native American Law Students Association is hosting the 2010 National NALSA Moot Court Competition Feb. 19-20.
The Dillon Lecture is named for Charles Hall Dillon, a pioneer South Dakota lawyer and South Dakota Supreme Court justice who died in 1928.
Northwest Indian Bar Association Winter 2009-2010 Newsletter
Here.
Articles on the recovery act, Carcieri v. Salazar, and Allen Sanders.
Michigan Bar Journal Special Indian Law Issue — UPDATED!
Here:
State Court Administrative Office – Court Improvement Program: Indian Child Welfare Act Forum Remarks, October 6, 2008
by Justice Michael F. Cavanagh
Indian Children and Termination of Parental Rights: Michigan Supreme Court Takes a Step in the Right Direction in In Re Lee
by Angel Sorrells, Cami Fraser, Thomas Myers, and Aaron Allen
Proceed with Prudence: Advising Clients Doing Business in Indian Country
by R. Lance Boldrey and Jason Hanselman
Indian Gaming and Tribal Self-Determination: Reconsidering the 1993 Tribal-State Gaming Compacts
by Zeke Fletcher
Indian Country Law Enforcement and Cooperative Public Safety Agreements
by Matthew L. M. Fletcher, Kathryn E. Fort, and Wenona T. Singel
And I completely missed this article in the same issue (many apologies to the authors!):
In the Law: Keeping Current with American Indian Legal Resources
by Jan Bissett and Margi Heinen
Fletcher Talk before UCLA Critical Race Studies Program Today
I’ll be speaking at UCLA today about my book project tentatively titled, “Consent and Resistance: American Indians and Consent Theory.”
Here’s the flyer for the entire speaker series:
Aviva Orenstein on How Evidence Rules Disproportionately Affect Indian Sexual Assault Defendants
Aviva Orenstein has published “Propensity or Stereotype? A Misguided Evidence Experiment in Indian Country,” in the Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy.
Here is the abstract:
In a significant break with traditional evidence rules and policies, the Federal Rules of Evidence concerning rape and child abuse, Rules 413 and 414, permit the government to admit the accused’s prior sexual misconduct as evidence of character and propensity. Although these rules have been roundly criticized, insufficient attention has been paid to the fact that in allowing propensity evidence for federal sex offenses (as opposed to offenses under state law), these rules disproportionately affect one distinct civilian population: Indians.
New Paper by Alex Skibine on Indian Cultural and Religious Rights
Alex Tallchief Skibine has posted his paper, “Culture Talk or Culture War in Federal Indian Law?“, forthcoming in the Tulsa Law Review (2010).
Here is the abstract:
In this article, I ask whether in the area of Native American cultural and religious rights federal law is more inclined towards “culture talk” meaning accommodations and compromises, or whether the attitude is more one of “culture war,” meaning geared towards confrontation and intolerance. I answer the question by focusing on how the law has treated Native American rights in four areas: use of peyote and controlled substances, possession of eagle feathers, implementation of the Native American Graves Protection Act, and protection of sacred sites. Not surprisingly, I conclude that there are both culture talks and culture wars going on. On the other hand, perhaps surprisingly, I find that among the three branches of the federal government, the courts have been the least willing to accommodate Native cultural and religious interests
Richard Delgado on the Origins of Critical Race Theory
Richard Delgado has posted his paper, “Liberal McCarthyism and the Origins of Critical Race Theory,” on SSRN. It is forthcoming in the Iowa Law Review.
Here is the abstract:
I wrote this piece exploring some of the intellectual origins of critical race theory for a 20-year anniversary of the movement held at the University of Iowa in April, 2009. In it, I look at the role of certain prominent university officers in purging their ranks of white radicals to prepare the way, in the late sixties and early seventies, for the first large group of post-Brown minority students who were starting to arrive around that time. I show how four promising white professors, two of law, one of history, and one of criminology lost their jobs and what they did afterward. I show that they continued to teach and write about left-wing thought in the hinterlands in ways that contributed to the rise of critical race theory. As they say, it is hard to kill an idea.
University of Colorado Indian Law Symposium — Jan. 28-30, 2010
January 28, 2010:
Book Signing: “Broken Landscape: Indians, Indian Tribes and the Constitution”
Leading scholar in American Indian law, Professor Frank Pommersheim will talk about his new book, “Broken Landscape: Indian Tribes and the Constitution,” which is a sweeping chronicle of Indian tribal sovereignty under the U.S. Constitution and the way that legal analysis and practice have interpreted and misinterpreted tribal sovereignty since the nation’s founding. After demonstrating that the federal government has repeatedly failed to respect tribal sovereignty, he closes with a proposal for a constitutional amendment that would reaffirm tribal sovereignty and accord Indian tribes and Indian people the respect and dignity that are their due. Book signing and reception to follow.
January 29-30, 2010:
The Next Great Generation of American Indian Law Judges
This conference will convene federal, state and tribal judges, practitioners, and academics to engage in a lively and open discussion about the future of federal Indian law in the judiciary. Academics, practitioners, students, and interested members of the public are welcome. CLE credits will be applied for.
Agenda here: The Next Great Generation Agenda Jan 2010
You must be logged in to post a comment.