Available on the Carpenter v. Murphy background page, but also here:
petitioner_s supplemental brief
united states supplemental brief
respondent_s supplemental brief
Worth a read. The federal government’s attorney’s representations about tribal criminal jurisdiction and tribal prerogatives are . . . interesting.
Here is the transcript in Gamble v. United States.
The docket page is here.
The NWIRC and NCAI brief is here: NIWRC Amicus Brief
Here is the government’s invitation brief in Harvey v. Ute Indian Tribe:
Here is the government’s brief in the Osage Wind matter:
I was interviewed by Tulsa Public Radio Station KWGS last week. A short summary is here.
Andrew Huff and Tim Coulter have released “Defending Morton v. Mancari and the Constitutionality of Legislation Supporting Indians and Tribes”.
Quote from the article
Supporting and defending the Mancari decision and the rule that it stands for – that laws benefiting tribes are not unconstitutional racial classifications – is a very high priority, perhaps the most urgent and important Indian law issue of our time. This paper reviews the decision in Mancari and the law leading up to and following it. We then turn to a discussion of the present challenges to the Mancari rule. In Part V, we suggest possible ways to support the decision and its rationale, and we discuss some additional legal arguments and approaches for defending the constitutionality of legislation benefiting tribes.
PDF of paper below and paper is available for download here
Here.
Here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.