Kristen Carpenter on Individual Religious Freedoms in American Indian Tribal Constitutional Law

Kristen Carpenter has published her essay, “Individual Religious Freedoms in American Indian Tribal Constitutional Law” in our new book, The Indian Civil Rights Act at Forty (UCLA American Indian Studies Center Publications 2012). It is available on SSRN.

Here is the abstract:

Written on the 40th Anniversary of the Indian Civil Rights Act, this article engages with a prominent critique of individual rights in tribal communities, namely that they effectuate the ‘assimilation’ of tribal people, values, and institutions. On the one hand, because American Indian religions emphasize collective values and experiences, this critique is particularly apt in the religion context, and the imposition of individual rights norms recalls the federal government’s historic efforts to destroy tribes by eradicating tribal religious practices. Moreover, in many tribal communities, religion is conceptualized and practiced not in terms of ‘rights’ but rather ‘duties’ to other people, plants, animals, natural features, and the ceremonies themselves. On the other hand, some Indian tribes have historically recognized personal liberties in spiritual practices, and now consider it an obligation of self-government to protect individual interests in religion. This article explores these themes, particularly as they manifest in tribal constitutional law, which reveals a broad spectrum of rights and duties, individual and collective protections. The article also elaborates on several ways that tribes recognize individual rights in the context of tribal culture, namely using tribal custom as a basis for interpreting positive law on individual religious rights, maintaining separate institutions for the resolution of legal disputes about religion, and engaging in constitutional reform to change religious rights provisions that are inconsistent with tribal values. In the final analysis, the article observes that that while many challenges remain, tribal governments often try to facilitate individual and collective interests in religious freedom today.

More Grand Canyon Skywalk Materials

Here:

Notice of Voluntary Dismissal

Affidavit of Chairwoman Benson

Declaration of Ted Quasula

02.29.2012 Letter from Sheri Yellowhawk

Materials in Tribal Immunity Dispute Involving Apache Tribe of Oklahoma

This disputes arises out of an alleged breach of a gaming machine lease agreement, and an alleged waiver of tribal immunity needed to enforce the agreement. Currently, the Tribe’s motion to remand the case back to state court is pending.

Here are the materials so far in Apache Tribe of Oklahoma v. TGS Anadarko (W.D. Okla.):

Wells Fargo Notice of Removal

Apache Tribe Motion to Remand

TGS Anadarko Opposition

Apache Tribe Reply

And here are the related state court materials:

Apache Tribe Complaint

Apache Tribe Application for Stay of Arbitration

TGS Anadarko Motion to Transfer Venue

Updated Version of Tulalip Justice System Study

We previously posted the study here.

Here is the updated study:

Justice in Indian Country- A Case Study of the Tulalip Tribes

Tulalip Tribes Justice System Case Study

Important scholarship. [Will be replaced soon.]

Updated version:

Justice in Indian Country- A Case Study of the Tulalip Tribes

South Dakota SCT Remands American Indian Probate Case to Allow Newly-Enrolled Heir to Reopen BIA Probate Decision

Here is the opinion in In re Estate of Flaws.

An excerpt:

Based upon the plain language of SDCL 29A-2-114 and the foregoing authorities, we hold that the trial court did not err in determining that the methods and time limits in the statute for establishing paternity are exclusive. A question remains, however, as to whether Yvette failed to comply with any of them. The trial court found that Yvette had petitioned the Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Office of Hearings and Appeals to reopen Donald’s probate to include her as an heir. For that reason, the court initially took this matter under advisement to see if Yvette’s petition would be granted. The court subsequently determined it could take more than a year to have Yvette’s petition heard. For that reason, the court issued its decision and this appeal followed. The day after the filing of Yvette’s appellant’s brief, however, the Bureau of Indian Affairs tribunal issued an order directing any parties opposed to naming Yvette as an heir to Donald’s estate to show cause for their objections within thirty days. Thus, Yvette’s efforts to reopen Donald’s probate may still prove successful, permitting her to comply with SDCL 29A-2-114(c) to establish Donald’s paternity. In the interests of justice, therefore, we remand this matter to the trial court to wait for a reasonable time for the Bureau of Indian Affairs’ decision and to proceed accordingly.

Kansas COA Affirms Tribal Authority to Adjudicate Kickapoo Tribal Member Land Disputes

Here is the opinion.

An excerpt:

Nancy Sue Bear claims the Brown County District Court did not have jurisdiction to dissolve the family partnership and then partition and order the sale of real estate that she and her family, all enrolled members of the Kickapoo Nation Tribe, had farmed on the Kickapoo Reservation. Indian tribes are domestic dependent nations that exercise inherent sovereign authority over their members and territories. Because all of the parties to their action are enrolled members of the Kickapoo Nation Tribe and all of the land is located within the Kickapoo Reservation, we hold that the tribal court is the proper forum for resolving this dispute. It is a matter of sovereignty. We reverse the judgments of the district court and remand the matter with directions to dismiss the case.

New Mexico Bar Journal Article on Navajo Nation Preference Laws and the EEOC

Here.

Fourth Edition of Schwartz & Hunter’s Directory of Tribal Courts Now Available

The fourth edition of April Schwartz and Mary Jo Brooks Hunter’s critically important United States Tribal Court Directory is now available.

Here.

NYTs Article on California Tribal Disenrollments

Here.