Here are the materials in Big Horn County Elec. Coop. v. Big Man (D. Mont.):
1-4 Absolooke Appeals Court Opinion Part 1
1-5 Absolooke Appeals Court Opinion Part 2
Here are the materials in Big Horn County Elec. Coop. v. Big Man (D. Mont.):
1-4 Absolooke Appeals Court Opinion Part 1
1-5 Absolooke Appeals Court Opinion Part 2
Here is “Judges discover strength in pivotal decisions” from the National Catholic Reporter.
The article reviews the new book, “Tough Cases: Judges Tell the Stories of Some of the Hardest Decisions They’ve Ever Made.”
Here are the materials in Aguilar v. Rodriguez (D.N.M.):
13 Motion for Immediate Release
Prior post here.
Dalindyebo Bafana Shabalala has posted “Intellectual Property, Traditional Knowledge, and Traditional Cultural Expressions in Native American Tribal Codes” on SSRN.
Here is the abstract:
Indigenous peoples and nations have been making demands for protection and promotion of their intellectual property, traditional knowledge, and traditional cultural expressions in domestic and international fora. The power of the basic demand is one that lies in claims of moral duty and human rights. This Article argues that in order for such claims to have power, one of the necessary elements for success is that the demandeurs themselves need to provide such protection within whatever scope of sovereignty that they exercise. In the context of Native American tribes seeking protection for Native American intellectual property under federal law in the broader territory of the United States, this Article argues that a necessary condition for success may be ensuring such protection on their own tribal territory. This Article serves as an early contribution to a broader research agenda aimed at providing more data as a basis for tribal claims for protection of their traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions. It presents a survey of the nature and scope of legal and formal protection that tribal legislation in the United States has provided for traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions. It further surveys and analyzes the nature and scope of protection provided under federal law and assesses the gap between what tribal codes provide and what federal law provides. It then proposes a series of next steps as a research agenda.
Kyle Fields has posted “Tohono O’odham Legal Systems” on SSRN.
Here is the abstract:
This short essay surveys the Tohono O’odham’s legal system through three periods. First, it discusses the traditional O’odham legal system, which relied on himdag (culture or way of life). Second, it reviews how the Spanish, using an inquisitorial system based on Christian religious law, altered the O’odham’s legal system. Third, it analyzes how the secular American adversarial system changed the O’odham’s legal system.
Here:
Here are the materials in Cheykaychi v. Giesen (D. Colo.):
Here are the materials in Coriz v. Rodriguez (D.N.M.):
Here are the materials in Romero v. Wounded Knee LLC (D.S.D.):
77 Plaintiff’s Brief on Tribal Exhaustion
78 Defendant’s Brief on Exhaustion
You must be logged in to post a comment.