Here are the new briefs in Alaska v. United States:
Cert petition here.
Alaska Native subsistence rights
Alaska v. United States Cert Petition [Alaska Native fishing subsistence rights]
Here:
Question presented:
Whether the United States can regulate fishing on Alaska’s navigable waters under the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act, when its statutory authority is limited to “public lands” and that term is defined as “lands, waters, and interests therein … the title to which is in the United States.”
Lower court materials here.
Ninth Circuit Reaffirms Katie John Trilogy and Affirms Injunction against State of Alaska
Ninth Circuit Materials in Alaska v. US [subsistence fishing]
Here are the briefs (that I choose to post because the others are ridiculous):
Kuskokwim River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission Brief
Alaska Federal Court Dismisses Most of Challenge to Gold Mine Project
Here are the materials so far in Village of Dot Lake v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (D. Alaska):
11-1 Federal Motion to Dismiss
Alaska Federal Court Affirms Alaska Native Subsistence Rights
Here are the materials in United States v. State of Alaska (D. Alaska):
US and Alaska Tribal Groups Win Injunction on State Subsistence Rules
Here are the materials in United States v. State of Alaska (D. Alaska):
[Library of Congress put that “uncivilized” bulls*** in there.]
SCOTUS Decides Sturgeon v. Frost II
Materials here.
Update — footnote 2 of the majority:
As noted earlier, the Ninth Circuit has held in three cases—the so called Katie John trilogy—that the term “public lands,” when used in ANILCA’s subsistence-fishing provisions, encompasses navigable waters like the Nation River. See Alaska v. Babbitt, 72 F. 3d 698 (1995); John v. United States, 247 F. 3d 1032 (2001) (en banc); John v. United States, 720 F. 3d 1214 (2013); supra, at 12. Those provisions are not at issue in this case, and we therefore do not disturb the Ninth Circuit’s holdings that the Park Service may regulate subsistence fishing on navigable waters. See generally Brief for State of Alaska as Amicus Curiae 29–35 (arguing that this case does not implicate those decisions); Brief for Ahtna, Inc., as Amicus Curiae 30–36 (same).
Oral Argument Transcript in Sturgeon v. Frost II
Sturgeon v. Frost II Background Materials
Merits Briefs:
National Parks Conservation Association Amicus Brief
Alaska Native Subsistence Users Amicus Brief
Cert Stage Briefs:
Alaska Amicus Brief in Support of Cert Petition
Federal Brief in Opposition to Cert
Lower court materials:
Opinion in Sturgeon v. Masica.
Mentasta Traditional Village et al Brief
Materials in Sturgeon v. Frost I:
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.