Link to job announcement here.
The U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Michigan, is currently recruiting for Assistant U.S. Attorney positions. This is a term announcement that closes on July 20, 2016.
Link to job announcement here.
The U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Michigan, is currently recruiting for Assistant U.S. Attorney positions. This is a term announcement that closes on July 20, 2016.
Link to vacancy announcement here.
The Eastern District of Michigan is hiring more than one Assistant US Attorney. The announcement will remain open to fill current and future vacancies. Applicants should have two years of experience post law school.
Here are the materials in Little River Band of Ottawa Indians and its Employee Welfare Plan v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (E.D. Mich.):
Here is the complaint in Avery v. Henry (E.D. Mich.):
Here:
Here are the materials in Buchwald Capital Advisors, LLC v. Papas (In re Greektown Holdings, LLC):
This case is on appeal from the bankruptcy court. Here are those materials.
Here are the materials in Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe v. Pearce (E.D. Mich.):
Here is the complaint in Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe v. Burwell (E.D. Mich.):
An excerpt:
This is a suit against the United States for breach of contract and statute by the Indian Health Service (“IHS”), an agency of the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) (collectively “Defendants”). The Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan (“Tribe”) seeks money damages under the Indian Self Determination and Education Assistance Act, 25 U.S.C. §§ 450 – 458ddd-2 (“ISDEAA”) and the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101 – 7109 (“CDA”) for the Defendants’ continued and repeated violation of the Tribe’s contractual and statutory right to the payment of full contract support costs (“CSC”) for fiscal year 2006.
Here are the materials in El Nefertit v. Powelson (E.D. Mich.):
Here are the materials in Narula v. Delbert Services Corp. (E.D. Mich.):
18 DCT Granting Motion to Dismiss
An excerpt:
Because the Court determines that the forum-selection clause does not apply in this case and the Arbitration Agreement is not a product of fraud and satisfies the Sixth Circuit test to grant motions to compel arbitration, the Court finds that Defendant’s motion to dismiss and compel arbitration [8] is GRANTED, the parties are ordered to Arbitrate this dispute, and the case is hereby DISMISSED.
You must be logged in to post a comment.