Tribes Sues California over Gaming Compact Negotiations

Here is the complaint in Cachil Dehe Band of Wintun Indians of the Colusa Indian Community v. State of California (E.D. Cal.):

1 Complaint

Ninth Circuit Briefs in Good Faith Negotiations Claim involving Pauma Band

Here are the briefs (so far) in Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation v. State of California:

pauma-band-opening-brief.pdf

california-answer-brief.pdf

Reply

Lower court materials here.

Tribes Sue California for Violation of Good Faith Obligation to Negotiate a Class III Compact

Here is the complaint in Chicken Ranch Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians of California v. State of California (E.D. Cal.):

1 complaint

California Prevails over Pauma Band in IGRA Good Faith Negotiations Litigation

Here are the materials in Pauma Band of Luiseño Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation v. State of California (S.D. Cal.):

27 Second Amended Complaint

30-1 State Motion to Dismiss + Strike

32 Response

33 Reply

36-1 State X Motion for Summary J

37-1 Tribe X Motion for Summary J

40 State Opposition

41 Tribe Opposition

43 State Reply

44 Tribe Reply

49 DCT Order

No Stay Pending IGRA Appeal in 10th Circuit for Pueblo of Pojoaque

Link: Previous posts

Here are further materials and briefs in the matter of Pueblo of Pojoaque v. State of New Mexico, 16-cv-00625 (D. NM):

Federal Court Dismisses Pojoaque Gaming-Related Dispute with New Mexico

Here are the materials in Pueblo of Pojoaque v. State of New Mexico (D.N.M.):

60-nm-motion-to-dismiss-count-iv

64-nm-motion-to-stay

65-nm-motion-to-modify-pi-order

66-response-to-60

69-nm-motion-to-modify

71-motion-to-dismiss-counts-iii-iv

72-motion-to-dismiss-count-ii

73-motion-to-dismiss-count-v

79-reply-in-support-of-60

85-response-to-65

86-response-to-72

87-response-to-71

88-response-to-69

89-response-to-73

90-response-to-64

94-reply-in-support-of-69

95-reply-in-support-of-73

96-reply-in-support-of-65

97-reply-in-support-of-72

98-reply-in-support-of-64

99-reply-in-support-of-71

118-dct-order

Prior posts here, here, and here.

Tenth Circuit materials here.

Update in North Fork v. California: Case Terminated

Here are the materials in North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians v. State of California (E.D. Cal.):

39 Picayune Amicus Brief

41 North Fork Response

46 DCT Order

Prior order here.

Pojoaque/New Mexico Contempt Materials in Gaming Compact Dispute

Here are the materials in Pueblo of Pojoaque v. State of New Mexico (D. N.M.):

53 Pojoaque Motion for Contempt

62 Response

68 Reply

115 DCT Order

An excerpt:

The Court will deny the Motion. First, although the Plaintiffs are not required to demonstrate that they suffered actual damages, such damages would help them to establish that the deferrals constitute threats. Second, the deferrals do not “threaten” the vendors within Judge Brack’s PI’s meaning. The Gaming Board, however, treads perilously close to civil contempt and should take care not to interfere with the Plaintiffs’ vendors.

Enterprise Rancheria Prevails in IGRA Good Faith Negotiations Suit against California

Here are the materials in Estom Yumeka Maidu Tribe of the Enterprise Rancheria v. State of California (E.D. Cal.):

14-1 Tribe Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings

16 Opposition

17-1 State Motion

19 State Legislature Amicus Brief

20 Tribe Reply

21 State Reply

27 DCT Order