Ninth Circuit Briefs in Good Faith Negotiations Claim involving Pauma Band

Here are the briefs (so far) in Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation v. State of California:

pauma-band-opening-brief.pdf

california-answer-brief.pdf

Lower court materials here.

Late Summer Update in Williams & Cochrane v. Quechan & Rosette Litigation

Here are the new materials in Williams & Cochrane LLP v. Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Reservation (S.D. Cal.):

216 DCT Order Dismissing W&C Reply Claim

217 DCT Order Dismissing Claims against Rosette

Prior posts here.

UPDATE (12/16/19):

219-1 Motion for Reconsideration of 216

220 Fourth Amended Complaint

227 WC Motion for Judgment on Pleadings on Counterclaims

236 Quehan Response to 219

237 Reply in Support of 219

247 DCT Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration

Update in San Pasqual Band Membership Suits

Here are the materials in Alegre v. United States (S.D. Cal.):

44 second Amended Complaint

46-1 US Motion to Dismiss

48 Response

49 Reply

50-1 Individual Defendants MTD

53 Response

59 DCT Order Dismissing SAC

62 Third Amended Complaint

68-1 US Motion to Dismiss

79 Response

83 Individual Defendants Reply

85 US Reply

98 DCT Order Dismissing Third Amended Complaint

Federal Court Rejects Amended Complaint in Pauma Band Union Dispute; Issues Judgment Favoring Union

Here are the new materials in Pauma Band of Luiseño Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation v. Unite Here International Union (S.D. Cal.):

44-1 Motion to File Third Amended Complaint

44-2 Proposed Third Amended Complaint

45 Union Opposition

46 State Opposition

47 Reply

48 DCT Order

Prior post here.

Materials in Outliers Collective v. Santa Ysabel Tribal Development Corporation

Here are the materials in Outliers Collective v. Santa Ysabel Tribal Development Corporation (S.D. Cal.):

1 Complaint

11 Motion to Dismiss

16 Response

17 Reply

23 DCt Order

Thanksgiving Update of Williams & Cochrane v. Quechan & Rosette Litigation [updated June 5, 2019]

Here are updated materials in Williams & Cochrane LLP v. Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Reservation (S.D. Cal.):

138-1 W&C Motion to Dismiss Quechan Counterclaims [94]

148 W&C Response to Quechan MTD [115]

150 W&C Opposition to Rosette Motion to Strike [109]

151 W&C Opposition to Rosette MTD [110]

161 Rosette Reply in Support of 109

162 Quechan Reply in Support of 115

164 Quechan Response to 138

167 W&C Reply in Support of 94

172 DCT Order

Prior posts here.

UPDATE:

173 DCT Order Denying 138

174 Third Amended Complaint

184 Quechan Motion to Strike

185-1 Rosette Motion to Strike

190 W&C Response to Quechan

193 W&C Response to Rosette

194 Quechan Reply

198 Rosette Reply

207-1 W&C Motion for Summary Judgment

California Prevails over Pauma Band in IGRA Good Faith Negotiations Litigation

Here are the materials in Pauma Band of Luiseño Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation v. State of California (S.D. Cal.):

27 Second Amended Complaint

30-1 State Motion to Dismiss + Strike

32 Response

33 Reply

36-1 State X Motion for Summary J

37-1 Tribe X Motion for Summary J

40 State Opposition

41 Tribe Opposition

43 State Reply

44 Tribe Reply

49 DCT Order

State and Union Prevail over Pauma Band over Labor Relations Dispute

Here are the materials in Pauma Band of Luiseño Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation v. Unite Here International Union (S.D. Cal.):

13 Amended Complaint

14-1 Union MTD

15-1 State MTD

20-1 Motion to File Second Amended Complaint

21 Union Opposition to 20

22 State Opposition to 20

23 Reply in Support of 20

25 Response to 14

26 Response to 15

28 Union Reply in Support of 14

29 State Reply in Support of 15

33 Second Amended Complaint

34-1 Union MTD Second Amended Complaint

36-1 State MTD Second Amended Complaint

37 Response to 34

38 Response to 36

39 Union Reply in Support of 34

40 State Reply in Support of 36

43 DCT Order

Update in Williams & Cochrane LLP v. Quechan Tribe

Here are updated materials in Williams & Cochrane LLP v. Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Reservation (S.D. Cal.):

39 First Amended Complaint

71-1 Motion to File Supplemental Complaint

91 Response to 71

93 Reply in Support of 71

94 Quechan Answer

95-1 Motion to Strike 94

97 DCT Order Denying 71

ADDITIONAL UPDATE (8/27/18):

98 Quechan Opposition to Motion to Strike

100 Second Amended Complaint

105-1 Motion to File Third Amended Complaint

105-2 Proposed Third Amended Complaint

109-1 Rosette Motion to Strike

110-1 Rosette Motion to Dismiss

115-1 Quechan Motion to Dismiss

120 Quechan Opposition to 105

121 Rosette Opposition to 105

124 Reply in Support of 105

135 DCT Order

Prior post here.

Federal Court Dismisses Most Claims in Battle of Law Firms over Quechan Legal Work

Here are the materials in Williams & Cochrane LLP v. Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Reservation (S.D. Cal.):

50-1 motion to dismiss

51-1 motion to disqualify

53-1 rosette motion to dismiss

73 williams response to 50

74 williams response to 53

75 williams response to 51

82 reply in support of 50

83 reply in support of 51

85 reply in support of 53

89 dct order