Here is the stipulation in Williams & Cochrane LLP v. Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Reservation (S.D. Cal.):
Prior post here.
Update. Here are recent pleadings from the parties on the substitution of parties that is interesting reading (not all the pleadings are available):
386 Rosette Parties Motion to Substitute [unavailable]
First, we want to express our deepest sympathy to the family and colleagues of Rob Rosette, who recently walked on far too young. Rob’s impact on Indian country and the practice of Indian law cannot be understated. He was a true giant in the field. Over the years, Rob and his firm hired many of our alums from Michigan State’s Indigenous Law and Policy Center, and for that we are grateful. He will be missed.
Here are the newest materials in Williams & Cochrane LLP v. Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Reservation (S.D. Cal.):
350 Rosette Reply in Support of 322
352 W&C Reply in Support of 328
353 Quechan Reply in Support of 329
354 W&C Reply in Support of 330
375 DCT Order on Summary Judgment Motions
Prior post here.
Here are new materials in in Williams & Cochrane LLP v. Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Reservation (S.D. Cal.):
235-1 W&C Amended Motion for Judgment on Pleadings
248 Quechan Response to W&C Motion for Judgment on Pleadings
254-1 Rosette Motion for Sanctions
258 W&C Reply in Support of Motion for Judgment on Pleadings
267 W&C Response to Motion for Sanctions
268 Rosette Reply in Support of Motion for Sanctions
Update (6/24/20):
292-1 W&C Motion for Reconsideration
313 DCT Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration
Case tag here.
Here are the new materials in Williams & Cochrane LLP v. Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Reservation (S.D. Cal.):
216 DCT Order Dismissing W&C Reply Claim
217 DCT Order Dismissing Claims against Rosette
Prior posts here.
UPDATE (12/16/19):
219-1 Motion for Reconsideration of 216
Here are updated materials in Williams & Cochrane LLP v. Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Reservation (S.D. Cal.):
138-1 W&C Motion to Dismiss Quechan Counterclaims [94]
148 W&C Response to Quechan MTD [115]
150 W&C Opposition to Rosette Motion to Strike [109]
151 W&C Opposition to Rosette MTD [110]
161 Rosette Reply in Support of 109
162 Quechan Reply in Support of 115
167 W&C Reply in Support of 94
Prior posts here.
UPDATE:
Here are updated materials in Williams & Cochrane LLP v. Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Reservation (S.D. Cal.):
71-1 Motion to File Supplemental Complaint
ADDITIONAL UPDATE (8/27/18):
98 Quechan Opposition to Motion to Strike
105-1 Motion to File Third Amended Complaint
105-2 Proposed Third Amended Complaint
109-1 Rosette Motion to Strike
110-1 Rosette Motion to Dismiss
115-1 Quechan Motion to Dismiss
Prior post here.
Here are the materials in Williams & Cochrane LLP v. Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Reservation (S.D. Cal.):
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.