Late Summer Update in Williams & Cochrane v. Quechan & Rosette Litigation

Here are the new materials in Williams & Cochrane LLP v. Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Reservation (S.D. Cal.):

216 DCT Order Dismissing W&C Reply Claim

217 DCT Order Dismissing Claims against Rosette

Prior posts here.

UPDATE (12/16/19):

219-1 Motion for Reconsideration of 216

220 Fourth Amended Complaint

227 WC Motion for Judgment on Pleadings on Counterclaims

236 Quehan Response to 219

237 Reply in Support of 219

247 DCT Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration

Thanksgiving Update of Williams & Cochrane v. Quechan & Rosette Litigation [updated June 5, 2019]

Here are updated materials in Williams & Cochrane LLP v. Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Reservation (S.D. Cal.):

138-1 W&C Motion to Dismiss Quechan Counterclaims [94]

148 W&C Response to Quechan MTD [115]

150 W&C Opposition to Rosette Motion to Strike [109]

151 W&C Opposition to Rosette MTD [110]

161 Rosette Reply in Support of 109

162 Quechan Reply in Support of 115

164 Quechan Response to 138

167 W&C Reply in Support of 94

172 DCT Order

Prior posts here.

UPDATE:

173 DCT Order Denying 138

174 Third Amended Complaint

184 Quechan Motion to Strike

185-1 Rosette Motion to Strike

190 W&C Response to Quechan

193 W&C Response to Rosette

194 Quechan Reply

198 Rosette Reply

207-1 W&C Motion for Summary Judgment

Update in Williams & Cochrane LLP v. Quechan Tribe

Here are updated materials in Williams & Cochrane LLP v. Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Reservation (S.D. Cal.):

39 First Amended Complaint

71-1 Motion to File Supplemental Complaint

91 Response to 71

93 Reply in Support of 71

94 Quechan Answer

95-1 Motion to Strike 94

97 DCT Order Denying 71

ADDITIONAL UPDATE (8/27/18):

98 Quechan Opposition to Motion to Strike

100 Second Amended Complaint

105-1 Motion to File Third Amended Complaint

105-2 Proposed Third Amended Complaint

109-1 Rosette Motion to Strike

110-1 Rosette Motion to Dismiss

115-1 Quechan Motion to Dismiss

120 Quechan Opposition to 105

121 Rosette Opposition to 105

124 Reply in Support of 105

135 DCT Order

Prior post here.

Federal Court Dismisses Most Claims in Battle of Law Firms over Quechan Legal Work

Here are the materials in Williams & Cochrane LLP v. Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Reservation (S.D. Cal.):

50-1 motion to dismiss

51-1 motion to disqualify

53-1 rosette motion to dismiss

73 williams response to 50

74 williams response to 53

75 williams response to 51

82 reply in support of 50

83 reply in support of 51

85 reply in support of 53

89 dct order