Coalition of Large Tribes Comments on the Tax Treatment of Tribally-Chartered Corporations and Other Entities Organized by Tribes Under Tribal Law

Here:

Tax!

Richard Pomp on Dilworth and Indian Taxation

Richard Pomp has published “Overturning Dilworth and the Impact on Tribes” in the May 29, 2023 edition of Tax Notes:

An excerpt: “The tribes in states with vendor-based sales taxes should be alert to this impending problem should the Court deny a review of the case. To be forewarned is to be forearmed.”

Oklahoma SCT Briefs in Stroble v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

Here:

Yeah, I know, not a federal case.

Washington Federal Court Dismisses Sauk-Suiattle Online Sales Tax Complaint

Here are the materials in Sauk-Suiatte Indian Tribe v. Ryser (W.D. Wash.):

Tax

Nebraska Federal Court Rules in HCI Distributing Tax Case

Here are the available materials in HCI Distributing v. Hilgers (formerly Peterson) (D. Neb.):

Prior post here.

St. Regis Mohawk Sue over Automobile Use Taxes

Here is the complaint in St. Regis Mohawk Tribe v. Franklin County (N.D. N.Y.):

Arizona COA Decision in Ute Mountain Ute Tribe v. Arizona Department of Revenue

Here:

New Scholarship on Tribal-State Tax Agreements

Pippa Browde has published “Sacrificing Sovereignty: How Tribal-State Tax Compacts Impact Economic Development in Indian Country” in the Hastings Law Journal (PDF).

Abstract:

Economic development is a critical component of tribal sovereignty. When a state asserts taxing authority within Indian Country, there is potential for overlapping, or juridical, taxation over the same transaction. Actual or even potential juridical taxation threatens economic development opportunities for tribes. For many years, tribes and states have entered into intergovernmental agreements called tax compacts to reduce or eliminate juridical taxation. Existing literature has done little more than mention tax compacts with cursory cost-benefit analyses of the agreements. This is the first Article to critically examine the role tax compacts serve in promoting tribes’ economic development.

This Article analyzes economic development activities in Indian Country as two types of transactions: when the tribe or tribal enterprise is engaging as a retailer, and when a tribe or tribal enterprise is working with non-tribal entities in joint ventures. Using these categories of transactions as a framework, and looking to existing compacts between various tribes and states as examples, the analysis focuses on the impact compacts have on economic development in Indian Country. This Article argues that compacts do not live up to the promise of resolving juridical taxation in a manner that fosters economic development opportunities for tribes.

Sauk-Suiattle Sues State over Taxes

Here is the complaint in Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe v. Ryser (W.D. Wash.):

New Mexico COA Holds Navajo Nation Member Who Rents is Exempt from State Income Tax

Here are the materials in Skeet v. New Mexico Taxation and Revenue Department:

Department Opening Brief

Answer Brief

Reply

Opinion

A wolf protesting taxes I guess.