Nooksack Tribal Court TRO Against Northwest Intertribal Court System; Nooksack Forms Tribal Supreme Court

Here is the order in Nooksack Indian Tribe v. Northwest Intertribal Court System (Nooksack Tribal Court):

order-granting-nit-tro-against-nics

Prior posts in this matter here and here.

Here are pleadings in a matter captioned In re Orders Entered by Nooksack Tribal Court of Appeals after May 30, 2015 (Nooksack Supreme Court):

in-re-orders-entered-by-nooksack-tribal-court-of-appeals-declaration-of-service-petition-for-review-and-motion-for-accelerated-review

in-re-orders-entered-by-nooksack-tribal-court-of-appeals-nooksack-indian-tribes-motion-for-accelerated-review-and-vacation-of-void-orders-of-the-court-of-appeals

in-re-orders-entered-by-nooksack-tribal-court-of-appeals-order-accepting-nooksack-indian-tribes-petiton-for-expedited-review-of-nooksack-tribal-court-orders

in-re-orders-entered-by-nooksack-tribal-court-of-appeals-plaintiff-nooksack-tribes-petition-for-review

 

Nooksack Tribe Sues Northwest Intertribal Court System in Nooksack Tribal Court

Here is the pleading in Nooksack Indian Tribe v. Northwest Intertribal Courts [sic] System:

5-emergency-mot-for-ex-parte-inj

Very Latest Rejected Nooksack Filings

Download(PDF):

Galanda v Bernard REJECTED Gabriel S Galanda’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment

Galanda v Bernard REJECTED Declaration of Gabriel S Galanda in Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment

Belmont v Kelly REJECTED Pro Se Formal Indications Re June 28 2016 Order

Nooksack 306: Clerk Rejects Petition, CoA Denies Motion

Download PDF: Belmont v. Kelly Order Denying Motion to Expand JurisdictionGladstone v. Kelly REJECTED Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Link to previous posts here.

Nooksack Tribal Clerk Now Rejecting Filings in Gladstone v. Kelly

Download PDF: Belmont (Roberts) v Kelly REJECTED Third Declaration of Michelle Joan Roberts in Support of Motion to Expand InjunctionGladstone v. Kelly REJECTED Motion for Permanent Injunction Margretty Rabang

Link to previous posts here.

Update on Nooksack Disenrollments: Tribal Court Now Rejects Pleadings from Tribal Members

Here are new pleadings (stamped rejected) in Belmont v. Kelly (Nooksack Tribal Court):

Belmont (Roberts) v Kelly REJECTED Motion to Expand Injunction

Belmont (Roberts) v. Kelly REJECTED Declaration of Michelle Joan Roberts in Support of Motion to Expand Injunction

Nooksack Indian Tribe Request for Qualifications — Pro Tem Judge Services

This Request for Qualifications is directed at qualified individuals and/or firms interested in serving as a Pro Tem Judge for the Nooksack Indian Tribe. The Nooksack Tribal Court exercises jurisdiction over a broad range of civil and criminal matters. A Pro Tem Judge will be appointed to hear cases, as assigned by the Chief Judge, in instances where the Nooksack Tribal Court Chief Judge is ill, disqualified, or otherwise unavailable. This is a part time, as-needed appointment, and compensation will be negotiated. Specifically, contractors providing Pro Tem Judicial services will be placed into a pool and drawn from on an as-needed basis when judicial conflicts arise.

DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES:

Preside over cases as assigned by the Chief Judge.

Prepare and issue written orders, judgments, search and arrest warrants.

Keep accurate records of cases and court hearings.

MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS:

Possess JD from an ABA-accredited law school and admitted to practice before the Supreme Court of the United States, or any United States Circuit Court of Appeals, or the Supreme Court of any state of the United States.

Extensive experience in: (1) criminal case adjudications; (2) juvenile dependency and delinquency; (3) family law and child support; and (4) general civil case adjudications, including complex litigation.

Demonstrated knowledge in the following areas: (1) Federal Indian law and policy; (2) Tribal law; and (3) Tribal customs and traditions.

Is at least 30 years of age.

Has never been convicted or pleaded guilty to any felony, nor been found guilty of any crime involving fraud or dishonesty.

Maintain a current business license and admitted to practice before the Nooksack Tribal Court.

Successfully pass a background investigation and drug test.

Interested individuals (or firms) should submit a letter of interest including availability, along with a current resume and the names of at least three professional references to:

Suzanne Brownrigg, Human Resources Director Nooksack Indian Tribe P.O. Box 157 Deming, WA 98244 (360) 592-5176 sbrownrigg@nooksack-nsn.gov

 

NOOKSACK INDIAN TRIBE REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS PRO TEM JUDGE SERVICES (6/2016)

 

New Nooksack Tribal Court Complaint re: Nooksack Government Actions

Here is the complaint in Gladstone v. Kelly (Nooksack Tribal Court):

Gladstone v Kelly Pro Se Complaint

News Profile of Nooksack Firing of Tribal Judge

Here is “Nooksacks Sack Judge After She Ruled against Tribal Council.

New Materials in Nooksack Disenrollment/Election/Disbarment Disputes

Here are filings in a new case captioned Tageant v. Kelly (Nooksack Tribal Court):

Tageant v Kelly Pro Se Complaint

Tageant v Kelly Pro Se Declaration of Carmen Tageant in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injuction

Tageant v Kelly Pro Se Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Declaratory Judgment

Here are new materials in Belmont v. Kelly (Nooksack Ct. App.):

Belmont v Kelly Amended Notice of Appeal

Belmont v Kelly Defendant-Appellants’ Motion for Stay

Belmont v Kelly Order Dismissing Defendant-Appellants’ Appeal