Here are the materials in United States v. Cline (W.D. Wash.):
Nooksack Tribal Court
Nooksack Update: Interior Threatens Reassumption; State Court Asserts PL 280 Jurisdiction
Downloads(PDF):
- 12-9-16 Letter from HUD Director to Robert Kelly, Jr.
- 12-13-16 Letter from Director Mary Smith to Robert Kelly, Jr
- 12-21-16 State Superior Court Order Granting Motion for Temporary Restraining Order
- 12-22-16 Tribal Court Order Following Show Cause Hearing
- 12-23-16 Letter from PDAS-IA Lawrence Roberts to Robert Kelly, Jr
Link: Previous posts
Nooksack Begins Disenrollee Evictions
Downloads (PDF):
- Order Allowing Entry, Order of Eviction and Writ of Restitution
- Rejected Answer to Complaint for Unlawful Detainer (pro se answer also rejected)
- Rejected Notice of Appearance
- Complaint for Unlawful Detainer
Links: Rejected motion, Complaint, Nooksack posts
Nooksack Update — Disenrollment Reconsideration; Kelly Letter to BIA; Whatcom County Materials
Here are the reconsideration materials:
Omnibus Written Disenrollment Reconsideration Request
Nooksack Disenrollee TANF Denial Letter
Nooksack Disenrollee Declaration re TANF Denial
Nooksack Disenrollee Declaration re Medical Presciption Denial
Nooksack Disenrollee Declaration re Elder Health Care Denial
Nooksack Disenrollee Declaration re Dental Care Denial
Here is the Kelly letter to BIA:
Letter from Bob Kelly to Lawrence Roberts
Here are the Whatcom County Superior Court materials:
Nooksack Update — “Tribe” Response to NICS and State Court Matters
Drama at Nooksack
Turtle Talk Poll Results — Nooksack Disenrollments
Few Turtle Talk readers support disenrolling the so-called Nooksack 306. The vast majority of TT readers think Nooksack should hold elections before disenrollments. There is a wide variety of opinions on which forum should resolve the disputes.
Question: Should the Nooksack 306 Be Disenrolled?
| COUNT | PERCENT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Yes |
12 | 4.44% | ||
|
No |
202 | 74.81% | ||
|
Don’t Know |
56 | 20.74% | ||
Question: Should the Nooksack Tribe Hold Elections Before Proceeding with Disenrollments?
| COUNT | PERCENT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Yes |
212 | 85.48% | ||
|
No |
25 | 10.08% | ||
|
Don’t Know |
11 | 4.44% | ||
Question: Which forum is the best place to resolve litigation arising from this dispute?
| COUNT | PERCENT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nooksack tribal council (incl. Nooksack Supreme Court) |
14 | 5.45% | ||
|
Nooksack tribal judiciary |
89 | 34.63% | ||
|
Bureau of Indian Affairs |
51 | 19.84% | ||
|
Federal or state courts |
80 | 31.13% | ||
|
International forums |
7 | 2.72% | ||
|
Other |
16 | 6.23% | ||
Nooksack Update
Kelly v. Kelly (Nooksack Tr. Ct.):
Kelly v. Kelly Rejected Second Amended Complaint
Belmont v. Kelly (Nooksack Ct. App.):
Rejected Declarations Re Nooksack Member Voting Rights
Nooksack Indian Tribe v. NICS (Nooksack Tr. Ct.):
Response to Order to Show Cause
Declaration of of Daniel Kamkoff in Response to Order to Show Cause
Administrative Disenrollment Matter (Nooksack Tr. Council):
Omnibus Written Response of Nooksack Tribal Members Proposed for Disenrollment
Washington Court Registers Judgment against Nooksack Police Chief under State Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act
Here are the materials in In re Gabriel Galanda v. Nooksack Tribal Court (Wash. Super. Ct. — Whatcom County):
You must be logged in to post a comment.