Klamath Sues over Two Endangered Fish Species

Here is the complaint in Klamath Tribes v. United States Bureau of Reclamation (N.D. Cal.):

1 complaint

Federal Court Dismisses ICRA Suit re: Elem Indian Colony of Pomo Indians Disenrollments

Here are the materials in John v. Garcia (N.D. Cal.):

74 Motion to Dismiss

76 Opposition

77 Reply

84 DCT Order

Federal Court Rejects Coyote Valley Band Challenge to Highway

Here are the materials in Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians of California v. United States Department of Transportation (N.D. Cal.):

118-1 US Motion for Summary Judgment

131 Tribe Motion re Federal Defendants

133 Tribe Motion re State Defendants

138 State Motion

139 US Response

144 Tribe Reply re 131

145 Tribe Reply re 133

146 US Reply

147 State Reply

157 DCT Order

Prior post here.

Yurok Fishing Case against Resighini Rancheria Dismissed

Here are the materials in Yurok Tribe v. Dowd (N.D. Cal.):

47 Motion to Dismiss

51 Opposition

52 Reply

55 Order

Tolowa Nation Complaint for Federal Recognition

Here is the complaint in Tolowa Nation v. United States (N.D. Cal.):

1 Complaint

Federal Court Dismisses Action by “Traditional Authority and Miskitu Government-In-Exile” against Nicaragua

Here are the materials in Robertson v. Republic of Nicaragua (N.D. Cal.):

78 Amended Complaint

81 Motion to Dismiss

82 Motion for Sanctions

84 Response to Motion to Dismiss

85 Response to Motion for Sanctions

87 Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss

92 DCT Order

Federal Court Denies TRO in Matter it Already Dismissed under the Tribal Exhaustion Doctrine

Here are the new materials in Acres v. Blue Lake Rancheria (N.D. Cal.):

53 Motion for TRO

54 DCT Order Denying TRO

Prior posts here.

Federal Court Allows Tribal NHPA Consultation Claims to Proceed in Freeway Challenge

Here are the materials in Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians of California v. United States Department of Transportation (N.D. Cal.):

68 Federal Motion to Dismiss

69 State Motion to Dismiss

73 Tribe Response to State Motion

74 Tribe Response to Federal Motion

76 Federal Reply

77 State Reply

94 DCT Order Partially Granting Federal Motion

Federal Court Again Dismisses Challenge to Blue Lake Rancheria Tribal Court Jurisdiction

Here are the materials in Acres v. Blue Lake Rancheria (N.D. Cal.):

39-blue-lake-motion

41-opposition

48-dct-minute-order

50-dct-order-written

An excerpt:

Plaintiff James Acres seeks declaratory and injunctive relief against the Blue Lake Rancheria Tribe (“Tribe”), the Blue Lake Rancheria Tribal Court (“Tribal Court”) and its Chief Judge, Lester Marston, alleging that the Tribal Court has conducted itself in bad faith in asserting jurisdiction over him in an underlying contractual fraud case because Judge Marston refused to recuse himself from the case and misrepresented his relationship with the Tribe. Judge Marston has now recused himself from the Tribal Court case and appointed the Hon. James Lambden, a retired California Court of Appeal Justice with no prior connection to the Tribe, to preside over the matter. Given Judge Marston’s recusal and the appointment of a neutral judge, there is insufficient evidence of bad faith for the exception to apply. Acres does not meet any of the exceptions to the exhaustion requirement. He must exhaust his tribal remedies before bringing an action of this kind in federal court. The Tribe’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED.

Hoopa and Yurok Tribes Prevail in ESA Litigation

Link: Federal Court Protects Klamath Salmon, Tribal and Fishing Communities (Earthjustice), previous post

Materials and briefs in the matter of Hoopa Valley Indian Tribe v. Bureau of Reclamation of the Department of the Interior of the United States of America et al, 16-cv-04294 (N.D. Cali.):