Oklahoma Criminal Appeals Court Holds Indian Status for Criminal Jurisdiction Purposes Requires Connection to Federally Recognized Indian Tribe

Here are the materials in Bertrand v. State of Oklahoma (Okla. Ct. Crim. App.):

Stitt v. City of Tulsa Cert Petition

Here:

Question presented:

Whether a state may exercise criminal jurisdiction over an Indian for conduct in Indian country absent a valid congressional grant of authority.

Lower court materials here.

Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals Decides Stitt v. City of Tulsa

Here:

Briefs here.

Petition for Rehearing in City of Tulsa v. O’Brien

Here:

Prior post here.

Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals Enables Tulsa to Prosecute Indians

Here is the opinion in City of Tulsa v. O’Brien:

Briefs are here.

Oklahoma Criminal Appellate Court Materials in City of Tulsa v. O’Brien

Here:

Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals Confirms Wyandotte Reservation Boundaries Remain Intact

Here are what I think are the relevant materials in State of Oklahoma v. Fuller:

Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals Says Castro-Huerta Means that Congress Didn’t Preempt State Criminal Jurisdiction in Indian Country [No, that’s not the law but nothing matters anymore.]

Here are the materials in Deo v. Parish:

Brief in Support of Mandamus Petition

State Response Brief

Opinions

Proposed State of Oklahoma, Act of June 16, 1906, Proposed forest reserve in southeastern Indian Territory

Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals Briefs in Stitt v. City of Tulsa

Here:

Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals Finds Ottawa and Miami Reservations Remain Extant

Here are the materials in State of Oklahoma v. Brester: