County May Attempt to Subject Poarch Band of Creek Indians to Taxation Under Carcieri

Here.

Class Action against High Stakes Bingo Machine Manufacturers Dismissed under Rule 19

This dispute arises from the Poarch Band’s high stakes bingo operations. Poarch Band was not named.

The case is Hardy v. IGT (M.D. Ala.):

Bally Motion to Dismiss

Multimedia Games Motion to Dismiss

Rocket Games Motion to Dismiss

DCT Order Dismissing Hardy Class Action

Federal Court Denies Right to Proceed in Claim against Poarch Creek Casino

Here are the materials in Allman v. Creek Casino Wetumpka (M.D. Ala.):

Magistrate Recommendation on Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis

DCT Order Adopting Magistrate Report

State of Alabama’s Expert on Class II Bingo Formerly Consulted for NIGC and Worked for Many Indian Tribes

As reported on Indianz and Pechanga the last few days, the State of Alabama’s retained expert, D. Robert Sertell,  on technical gaming issues took issue with the NIGC’s determination that Poarch Band of Creek Indians gaming operations are legal. Here’s a quote from a news article titled “FBI could raid Alabama’s Indian casinos, says gambling expert,” that quotes Sertell extensively:

Sertell visited Poarch Creek gaming operations and concluded in a 2004 report that their machines did not qualify as Class II gaming and were therefore illegal.

In a telephone interview this month, Sertell questioned the competence and integrity of the national commission, saying Stevens’ letter “ignores federal law so hard, it’s almost laughable.”

“NIGC’s executives are all members of Indian tribes,” he said of the commission. “This is Indians regulating Indians.”

In addition to not wanting to “alienate their Indian relatives and friends,” the agency is also inclined to ignore illegal gambling operations because increased Indian gambling revenue means more funding for the commission, Sertell said.

As Sertel’s CV (Sertell CV, not sure how old this is) notes, he has worked for many, many Indian tribes on technical issues. He even wrote an expert report for Shingle Springs Miwok years ago (Shingle Springs Declaration). Also, he consulted with the NIGC from 1998-2001, during a period of time in which NIGC’s position was that virtually all electronic bingo should be classified as Class III, a position rejected by two federal circuits (Tenth Circuit and Eighth Circuit).

Alabama v. United States Materials

The Southern District of Alabama dismissed Alabama’s challenge to the Department of Interior’s Class III procedures, on grounds of ripeness.

Here is the opinion, courtesy of Indianz.

us-motion-to-dismiss

poarch-creek-motion-to-dismiss

alabama-response-brief

us-reply-brief

poarch-creek-reply-brief

alabama-supplemental-brief

us-supplemental-brief

poarch-band-supplemental-brief

State of Alabama v. United States — Challenge to Class III Procedures

Following Texas’s successful challenge to the Class III procedures in the Fifth Circuit, Alabama is doing the same in the S.D. Ala. (part of the old 5th Circuit, now the 11th Circuit). This case involves the Poarch Band of Creek Indians.

alabama-complaint

alabama-motion-for-preliminary-injunction

us-motion-to-dismiss-alabama-complaint

poarch-band-motion-to-dismiss-alabama-complaint

Freemanville Water System v. Poarch Band of Creek Indians (S.D. Ala.)

This is tribal sovereign immunity case. The district court granted the tribe’s motion to dismiss. Here are the materials:

Complaint

Continue reading