News coverage from the Bellingham Herald here.
Materials on the St. Germain v. DOI case here.
Materials in St. Germain v. Dept. of Interior (W.D. Wash.):
60 Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs
71 Stipulation for Order of Dismissal with Prejudice; Order Thereon
Prior post here.
Here are the materials in St. Germain v. Dept. of Interior (W.D. Wash.):
doc. 56 – Plaintiffs’ Motion for Voluntary Dismissal
Here are the materials in St. Germain v. Dept. of Interior (W.D. Wash.):
doc. 38 – Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Partial Summary Judgment
doc. 41 – Response Re Motion to Dismiss
doc. 42 – Reply Re Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
doc. 44 – Order Granting Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
Here are the updated materials in St. Germain v. Dept. of Interior (W.D. Wash.):
29 – Defendants’ Motion for Order Determining Applicable Standard of Judicial Review
30 – Response Re Motion for Order Determining Applicable Standard of Review
31 – Defendants’ Reply re Motion for Order Determining Applicable Standard of Judicial Review
32 – Declaration of Judith R Joseph
Prior materials in this federal case here.
Here are the materials in St. Germain v. Dept. of Interior (W.D. Wash.):
4-Motion for TRO and Proposed Order
23 Defendant’s Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Application for a TRO
Here is the opinion.
The court’s syllabus:
Civil case – Indian law. Because the district court had adjudicated the issue of subject matter jurisdiction in the Sandy Lake Band’s previous suit, and Sandy Lake did not appeal from that decision or exhaust its administrative remedies, the court is bound by the district court’s original determination that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction; the district court’s dismissal order is affirmed, but modified to be without prejudice.
Briefs:
Lower court materials here.
Here are the materials in Sekayumptewa v. Salazar (D. Ariz.):