Here are the materials in Apache Tribe of Okla. v. Brown et al. (W.D. Okla.), so far:
Apache Tribe v Brown Complaint
Foshee and Yaffe Motion to Dismiss
Apache Tribe Opposition to Brown Motion to Dismiss
Here are the materials in Apache Tribe of Okla. v. Brown et al. (W.D. Okla.), so far:
Apache Tribe v Brown Complaint
Foshee and Yaffe Motion to Dismiss
Apache Tribe Opposition to Brown Motion to Dismiss
Here are the materials in Morgan Buildings and Spas Inc v. Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma (W.D. Okla.):
DCT Order Dismissing Morgan Complaint
Iowa Tribe Renewed Motion to Dismiss
Here are the materials, in which the federal court affirmed a DOI decision related to a tribal election matter:
DCT Order Affirming DOI Decision
Here are the materials in Muhammad v. Comanche Nation Casino (W.D. Okla.):
DCT Order Denying Muhammad Motion to Remand
Muhammad Response to Motion to Dismiss
Comanche Reply re Motion to Dismiss
Interesting case: Muscogee Housing v HUD Complaint
Yesterday, July 2, according to Michael McBride. Here is the federal injunction at issue:
Judgment Confirming Arbitration Award in Favor of ESTOO 07-01.
Here is Tuesday’s judgment in the Chickasaw/Choctaw case: 2010-06-29 (38) Judgment.
Here is the opinion: Eastern Shawnee Tribe v. State of Oklahoma.
The Tribe’s motion for summary J and its complaint were posted earlier today here.
Similar to the Chickasaw and Choctaw case we noted last week.
Here are the materials in Eastern Shawnee Tribe v. Oklahoma:
2010172 – ESTOO v. OK – Complaint – FILE-STAMPED 5.4.10 – 1 –
2014075 – ESTOO v. OK – Plaintiff ESTOOs Motion for Summary J
Here is the order in Choctaw Nation and Chickasaw Nation v. State of Oklahoma (W.D. Okla.): choctawchickasaworder.
If you’ll recall, the Oklahoma Supreme Court in a series of cases held that state courts were “courts of competent jurisdiction” to take jurisdiction over tort claims brought under a Class III gaming compact approved by Oklahoma voters and, later, several Oklahoma tribes.
Oklahoma tribes (with the State consenting) then invoked the arbitration provision of the compacts, arguing the Supreme Court had violated the terms of the compact. They were successful.
This federal suit followed. Very interesting case.
You must be logged in to post a comment.