Here are the materials in Woods v. Nunn (W.D. Okla.):
Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Chemehuevi 638 Suit Dismissed, Moot
Here are the materials in Chemehuevi Indian Tribe v. United States (D. Ariz.):
National Writers Series: Robin Wall Kimmerer — June 10, 2021
Details here.
ROBIN WALL KIMMERER

Robin Wall Kimmerer is a mother, scientist, decorated professor, and enrolled member of the Citizen Potawatomi Nation. She is the author of Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge and the Teaching of Plants, which has earned Kimmerer wide acclaim. Her first book, Gathering Moss: A Natural and Cultural History of Mosses, was awarded the John Burroughs Medal for outstanding nature writing.
As a writer and a scientist, her interests in restoration include not only restoration of ecological communities, but restoration of our relationships to land. She holds a BS in Botany from SUNY ESF, an MS and PhD in Botany from the University of Wisconsin and is the author of numerous scientific papers on plant ecology, bryophyte ecology, traditional knowledge and restoration ecology.
EVENT AND BOOK
This special TICKETED virtual event is presented in partnership with For Love of Water (FLOW), a nonprofit dedicated to protecting and preserving the extraordinary and essential natural resources of the Great Lakes. Half of the proceeds from our ticket sales will go to FLOW to support their mission. We are also honored to welcome Chairman David M. Arroyo of the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians for a blessing at the beginning of our event, and the Botanic Garden at Historic Barns Park as a community partner.
As a botanist, Robin Wall Kimmerer has been trained to ask questions of nature with the tools of science. As a member of the Citizen Potawatomi Nation, she embraces the notion that plants and animals are our oldest teachers. In Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge and the Teachings of Plants, Kimmerer brings these two lenses of knowledge together to take us on “a journey that is every bit as mythic as it is scientific, as sacred as it is historical, as clever as it is wise” (Elizabeth Gilbert).
Braiding Sweetgrass weaves together a central argument: that the awakening of a wider ecological consciousness requires the acknowledgment and celebration of our reciprocal relationship with the rest of the living world.
This event is made possible in part by a grant from the Michigan Humanities, an affiliate of the National Endowment for the Humanities.
GUEST HOST | MATTHEW L.M. FLETCHER

Matthew L.M. Fletcher is Foundation Professor of Law at Michigan State University College of Law and Director of the Indigenous Law and Policy Center. He has been a visiting professor at the University of Arizona Rogers College of Law, the University of Michigan Law School, the University of Montana Blewett School of Law, and Stanford Law School. He is a frequent instructor at the Pre-Law Summer Institute for American Indian students. He sits as the Chief Justice of the Poarch Band of Creek Indians Supreme Court and also sits as an appellate judge for the Colorado River Indian Tribes, the Hoopa Valley Tribe, the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe, the Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians, the Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians, the Nottawaseppi Huron Band of Potawatomi Indians, the Rincon Band of Luiseño Indians, the Santee Sioux Tribe of Nebraska, and the Tulalip Tribes. He is a member of the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians.
Ninth Circuit Affirms Conviction in US v. Polequaptewa
Indian Country DV Training @ Tule River
New Issue of the American Indian Law Journal, Vol. 9, No. 2
Here:
Current Issue: Volume 9, Issue 2 (2021)
Articles
In Defense of the Indian Commerce Clause
Stephen Andrews
The Time Is Now For The IACHR To Address Climate Action As A Human Right: Indigenous Communities Can Lead (Again)
Lara C. Diaconu
Unqualified? Investing In Qualified Opportunity Zones On Reservations
Ben Gibson
Beyond A Sliver Of A Full Moon: Acknowledging And Abolishing White Bias To Restore Safety & Sovereignty To Indian Country
Mary T. Hannon
Inuit Nunangat Regional Overlaps: Reciprocal Harvesting & Wildlife Management Agreements
Christopher M. Macneill
Rebalancing Bracker Forty Years Later
William McClure and Thomas E. McClure
Native Nations’ Land Ownership And Our Disservice To Their People And Culture A Proposed Legislative Solution And A Lesson To Be Learned
David E. Missirian
The Blind Eye: Jus Soli, And The “Pretended” Treaty Of New Echota
Christopher Robert Rossi
Case Law On American Indians
Thomas P. Schlosser
SCOTUS Grants Stay in Oklahoma v. Bosse [post-McGirt criminal appeal]
Here are the materials related to the application for a stay by the State of Oklahoma in Oklahoma v. Bosse:
Lower court materials here.
National Indian Law Library Bulletin (5/26/2021)
Here:
We have scoured the web. Here are some of the latest materials related to Indian Law. Find all of the latest updates at https://narf.org/nill/bulletins/
Federal Courts Bulletin
https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2021.html
- Loring v. Daly (Tribal Sovereign Immunity; Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act)
- United States, Osage Minerals Council v. Osage Wind, LLC (Wind Turbines; Property Rights)
- Noem v. Haaland (National Historic Preservation Act; Religious Freedom Restoration Act)
State Courts Bulletin
https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.html
- Petitioner/Cross-Respondent: The People of the State of Colorado, In the Interest of Minor Children: K.C. and L.C., v. Respondents/Cross-Petitioners: K.C. and L.C., and Concerning Respondent: D.C. (Indian Child Welfare Act)
- Great Plains Lending, LLC v. Department of Banking (Tribal Sovereign Immunity; Sovereign Lending)
- Jamelle A. v. Department of Child Safety (Indian Child Welfare Act)
U.S. Legislation – 117th Congress Bulletin
https://narf.org/nill/bulletins/legislation/117_uslegislation.html
- S.1725 – A bill to grant a Federal charter to the National American Indian Veterans, Incorporated.
- S.1735 – A bill to establish an Office of Native American Affairs within the Small Business Administration, and for other purposes.
- S.1797/H.R.3496 – To amend the Indian Health Care Improvement Act to expand the funding authority for renovating, constructing, and expanding certain facilities.
Law Review & Bar Journal Bulletin (contact us if you need help finding a copy of an article)
https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/lawreviews/2021.html
- Ending the interminable gap in Indian Country water quality protection.
- Native treaties and conditional rights after Herrera.
- “The rule of the strong, not the rule of law”: Reexamining implicit divestiture after McGirt v. Oklahoma.
- Tribal lending after Gingras.
News Bulletin
https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/news/currentnews.html
This week, in brief:
- Bipartisan bill brings long-overdue boost to urban Indian health providers
- Washington State Tribal Coalition passes unprecendented climate change bill, puts consent instead of consultation into law
- Gov. Noem’s Mount Rushmore lawsuit sparks legal fight with tribe
- In new ad campaign, tribal coalition urges Biden to ‘restore and expand’ Bears Ears monument
- Colonization’s dark history puts heavy burden on tribes seeking repatriation of remains, objects
- Protocol will help guide Indigenous knowledges and data collecting, sharing, interpretation and storage
- Indigenous healthcare professional and student discuss their journeys in the healthcare field
- The Gila River Indian Community innovates for a drought-ridden future
- Call Number with American Libraries Podcast: NILL Director Anne Lucke discusses the importance of a library dedicated to tribal law
- Petroglyph vandalism is not a victimless crime
Washington COA Rejects Makah Challenge to State Land Exchange (and Three Tribes’ Effort to Stop the Whole Thing)
Here are the materials in Makah Indian Tribe v. Commissioner of Public Lands (Wash. Ct. App.):
D2 54945-0-II Unpublished Opinion
State Response to Hoh-Quiluete-Quinault Amicus Brief
Makah Answer to Hoh-Quiluete-Quinault Amicus Brief
[missing from the court’s website are the initial briefs of the tribe and state, and the Hoh-Quiluete-Quinault amicus brief]
An excerpt:
The Makah Indian Tribe appeals the superior court’s order denying a constitutional writ to block a land exchange proposed by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and approved by the Board of Natural Resources. The land exchange, called the “Peninsula Exchange,” would exchange state forestlands with forestlands owned by a private timber company, Merrill & Ring. The Peninsula Exchange parcels border tribal lands of a number of Indian tribes, including the Makah, the Hoh, the Quileute, and the Quinault. The Makah argue that DNR violated (1) the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) by failing to conduct a SEPA environmental review prior to approval of the proposal and (2) the public lands management statute, Title 79 RCW, by insufficiently addressing the Makah’s concerns.
The Hoh, Quileute, and Quinault Tribes (the Amici Tribes) filed a joint amicus curiae brief requesting dismissal under CR 19, arguing that they are necessary and indispensable parties who cannot be joined due to their sovereign immunity. The Amici Tribes claim that the Peninsula Exchange parcels are part of their respective treaty hunting areas. The Makah argue that the Amici Tribes are not necessary and indispensable parties under CR 19 because this appeal can be decided without a determination of treaty rights of various tribes as the Makah’s claims are procedural challenges to DNR’s Peninsula Exchange.Because we resolve this appeal without implicating the treaty rights of the various interested tribes, we hold that the Amici Tribes are not necessary or indispensable parties. Accordingly, dismissal of this appeal under CR 19 is not appropriate.
DNR’s interpretation of the SEPA categorical exemption is entitled to substantial weight and its determination that a land exchange is categorically exempt from SEPA review will be overturned only if it is clearly erroneous. We hold that DNR properly interpreted and applied the SEPA categorical exemption for state land exchanges to determine that the Peninsula Exchange was categorially exempt from SEPA review and that DNR’s finding that the Peninsula Exchange was exempt from SEPA was not clearly erroneous. Additionally, DNR complied with the public lands management statute by adequately consulting with the Makah prior to the Board’s approval of the Peninsula Exchange. Because the superior court’s decision was not manifestly unreasonable, or exercised on untenable grounds or for untenable reasons, we hold that the superior court did not abuse its discretion by denying the Makah a constitutional writ. We affirm.
Update with the rest of the briefs:
2020.08.17 QTA Declaration and Report
2020.08.18 Order Allowing QTA Amicus Brief
2020.08.29 Opening Brief of Makah Tribe
2020.09.11 QTA Amicus Declaration
Prisoner Suit against Salt River Corrections Dismissed
Here are the materials in Loring v. Daly (D. Ariz.):

You must be logged in to post a comment.