Here.
Apparent Hate Crime Against Native Protesters in Reno, NV
Here.
Here.
Register here.
In this much anticipated opinion, the Washington Supreme Court has ruled that, in violation of state law, Whatcom County did not ensure the existence of adequate water supplies before issuing building permits. The case will protect stream flows from the “death by a thousand cuts” impact of small wells. Many Washington tribes have sought to protect stream flows from these so-called exempt wells. The opinion is here.
Here.
Here.
Previous coverage of the 9th Circuit panel decision is here.
UPDATE (8/23/16):
122-1-Amici motion from Klamath basin
122-2-Klamath basin amici brief
UPDATE (5/19/17):
Here.
Here. Professor O’Neill provides a detailed and understandable summary of the many problems with Ecology’s draft standards and also explains EPA’s role and the District Court for the Western District of Washington’s recent decision.
The District Court’s decision in Puget Soundkeeper Alliance v. EPA is here: Puget Soundkeeper v EPA Order on Summary Judgment 8-3-16.
It appears likely that the WSBA will enact an outright ban. The Indian Law Section’s comment letter is here.
In this case, Automotive United Trades Organization seeks to prohibit political campaigns from accepting contributions from tribes on the theory that those contributions represent public monies and are therefore illegal under Washington law. The complaint is here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.