ND Tribe Plans to Launch Riverboat Gambling Yacht

The Three Affiliated Tribes plans to dedicate a yacht next month that eventually will be used for a riverboat gambling operation on the Missouri River in North Dakota.

The tribe earlier this year reached an agreement with the state to allow for the expansion of gambling on the Fort Berthold Reservation, which straddles the Lake Sakakawea reservoir on the Missouri. A yacht currently is being assembled at the tribally owned 4 Bears Casino and Lodge west of New Town, the Minot Daily News reported.

Here.

Gov. Snyder Refuses to Concur with Interior on KBIC Off-Reservation Casino Application

Here, via Pechanga.

This is interesting:

Governor Snyder did state that he was open to relocation as part of a broader agreement between the tribe and the state. Potential points for such an agreement include:

·         Allowing local governments to have some say in the disposition of the 2 percent local casino revenue sharing payments

·         The tribe entering into an agreement requiring the tribal businesses to collect tax on transactions with non-Native Americans

·         Working out a revised revenue sharing agreement so the tribe would continue to make some level of payments to the state, even if future gaming competition develops elsewhere in the state.  Currently, the KBIC is the only tribe with gaming operations in the state that has an agreement that would stop revenue payments if state-authorized gaming was expanded in Michigan.

In a two-part determination, which allows the governor to concur or not, these points are irrelevant. However, in a compact negotiation, these points appear to put KBIC in a very strong negotiating position in that the governor’s demands appear to violate IGRA’s requirement that the governor negotiate in good faith. Asking for more revenue sharing without any meaningful economic concessions, and demanding tribal tax collection, and demanding the institution of a local revenue sharing board — way overboard, in my view. Will be interesting to see what KB does — go with the Secretarial procedures, or simply sue the governor under the 1993 compacts and litigate good faith.

Wells Fargo Sues Chukchansi for Trust Indenture Violations arising from Leadership Dispute

Here are the materials in Wells Fargo Bank v. Chukchansi Economic Development Authority (N.Y. Sup. Ct.):

Summons and Complaint

Order to Show Cause

Memorandum of Law

Michigan Sixth Circuit Answer Brief in Michigan v. Sault Ste. Marie Tribe

Here:

Michigan Brief

Opening brief is here.

Gaming Facility Lease Dispute Dismissed from Conn. Courts

Here is the opinion in Big Bubba’s BBQ, LLC v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming Auth. (Conn. Super.) (PDF).

An excerpt:

As a matter of fact and of law, this court finds no waiver of sovereign immunity that would permit this court to proceed with this case.   More specifically, the court finds no such waiver as to a suit under Conn. Gen.Stat. § 47a–43, whether the trial be by court or jury (see Conn. Gen.Stat. § 47a–44 and § 47a–45), or as to the equitable relief sought in this case (see Conn. Gen.Stat. § 47a–45a(a), including restitution, and § 52–471 et seq., as to an injunction with or without bond) or as to any potential (but not pled) double damages claim (see Conn. Gen.Stat. § 47a–46).

No News from SCT on Michigan v. Bay Mills Cert Petition

Today’s order list.

Curious. It could mean several things. Most likely is that one of the Justices is thinking about drafting a dissent from the denial of certiorari. We’re not aware of any similar cases in the pipeline that would compel a hold, which is another possibility.

City of Duluth’s Opposition to NIGC Motion to Dismiss Suit over Fond du Lac Casino Revenues

Here:

Duluth Opposition

The MTD is here.

The complaint is here.

National Indian Gaming Commission Moves to Dismiss Chukchansi Gaming Ordinance Suit

Here is the motion in Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians v. Stevens (D. D.C.):

NIGC Motion to Dismiss Chukchansi Complaint

Complaint is here.

New Scholarship on Tribal Gaming Revenue Allocation Plans

Thaddieus W. Conner and William A. Taggart have published “Indian Gaming and Tribal Revenue Allocation Plans: Socio-economic determinants of policy adoption” in the Social Science Journal. Here is the abstract:

As the Indian gaming industry has experienced unprecedented growth over the past two decades, tribes have pursued different paths regarding the utilization of gaming revenues within parameters established by the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act. Since 1993, more than 100 tribes have received approval through the Department of the Interior to distribute revenues directly to tribal members through per capita payments governed by a Tribal Revenue Allocation Plan (RAP). This paper improves our understanding of nations with payment plans by exploring whether socio-economic tribal features are associated with the successful adoption of a RAP. We find that tribes who gained approval of a RAP in the 1990s have higher per capita incomes, while also having smaller populations and lower levels of educational attainment. Population is the strongest predictor of RAP adoptions in both the 1990s and 2000s, with the impact of other tribal features being less meaningful in explaining adoption in the second decade.

Email me if you want a pdf.

Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community on Schedule in Supreme Court Conference Today

See SCOTUSblog. And docket. We should know Monday.

Here are the briefs:

Michigan v Bay Mills Cert Petition w Appendices

Bay Mills Cert Opp

Michigan Cert Stage Reply

United States Invitation Brief

Michigan Supplemental Brief