A guest post from MSU 2L Adrea Korthase:
Following the Supreme Court denial of cert in Harjo v. Pro Football, Inc., a new group of plaintiffs has emerged to challenge the laches defense. However, maybe there is the potential for a new defendant as well.
On Wednesday, January 13th, the Supreme Court will hear American Needle v. National Football League. American Needle brought a claim against the NFL for violating antitrust statutes when the football league signed an exclusive license agreement with Reebok. The district court granted summary judgment to the NFL and the Seventh Circuit affirmed the district court’s decision, agreeing that the NFL could act as a single entity. The Supreme Court granted cert.
There is wide ranging speculation as to what will happen if the NFL prevails and the Court defines the league as a single entity. Those who are concerned cite everything from higher ticket prices to union lockouts as possible outcomes. However, if the NFL is considered a single entity, it may help the mascot fight.
If the Court determines that the NFL is a single entity and has the power to license and market their intellectual property, it is possible that the Redskin’s trademark would be part of that property. A determination of a change in hands, a change in control, could weaken a laches defense because it would have been impossible to bring an action against a single entity that did not exist until now.
In addition, because a laches defense, unlike statute of limitations, is a decision of the court, the change in the NFL’s distinction may be influential. It is possible that a court will find that the NFL has a greater responsibility, as a single entity, to rid the league of racist and disparaging trademarks.