Here:
The report of the decision in Meyer & Assocs. v. Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana I is here:
Here:
The report of the decision in Meyer & Assocs. v. Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana I is here:
Here is the opinion in City of Duluth vs. Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians. Link to oral argument video here. Briefs are not available publicly, so if anyone has them, please send along.
Here are the briefs:
08 26 13 FDL Initial Brief – FINAL
09 30 13 City of Duluth Response Brief
An excerpt:
When an Indian band enters into a contract with a city, waives its sovereign immunity, and consents to be sued only in federal district court, a state court may go no further than interpreting contractual provisions pertaining to jurisdiction to determine whether the court has jurisdiction over a dispute arising under the contract.
Our post with a link to the Minnesota Court of Appeals decision, now reversed, is here.
Here is an update in Seaport Loan Products LLC v. Lower Brule Community (N.Y. Supreme Ct.):
63 Lower Brule Motion to Dismiss
77 Adlwych Capital Partners Opposition
Here is the unpublished opinion in City of Duluth v. Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa (Minn. App.).
Here.
Here is the complaint in River Trails LLC v. Delaware Enterprise Authority (N.D. Okla.):
Here is the opinion in Seaport Loan Products LLC v. Lower Brule Community (N.Y. Supreme Ct.):
Seaport-LBCDE – Decision re Motion to Compel
News coverage: NY Law Journal Article (Sovereign Immunity)
The complaint is here.
Here:
Questions Presented:
1. Does Lapides v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, 535 U.S. 613 (2003), provide a basis for finding a waiver of tribal sovereign immunity where an Indian Tribe has expressly waived sovereign immunity, is sued in state court, removes to federal court, and then asserts sovereign immunity based on the Tribe’s concealment of the fact that the Tribe did not comply with the Secretary of the Interior’s lease approval requests?
2. Does Justice Brandeis’ opinion in Turner v. United States, 248 U.S. 354 (1919). support the concept of tribal sovereign immunity or should that accidental doctrine, questioned in Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma v. Manufacturing Technologies, Inc., 523 U.S. 751 (1998), be revisited and discarded.
3. Does the Indian Civil Rights Act, Title 25 U.S.C. § 1302(a)(5) and (a)(8) create an implicit cause of action permitting the Tribe to be sued for the taking of property without due process of law?
You must be logged in to post a comment.