Here are additional materials in Luckerman v. Narragansett Indian Tribe (D. R.I.):
29 Motion to Correct the Record
34 DCT Order on Amending the Record
Meanwhile, the tribe has appealed the sovereign immunity issue here to the First Circuit.
Here are additional materials in Luckerman v. Narragansett Indian Tribe (D. R.I.):
29 Motion to Correct the Record
34 DCT Order on Amending the Record
Meanwhile, the tribe has appealed the sovereign immunity issue here to the First Circuit.
Here are the updated materials in Luckerman v. Narragansett Indian Tribe (D. R.I.):
18-1 Narragansett Motion for Reconsideration
22 DCT Order Denying Reconsideration
An excerpt:
On August 29, 2013, this Court denied Defendant Narragansett Indian Tribe’s (“Tribe”) motion to dismiss, but stayed adjudication of the case pending tribal exhaustion.1 Now, the Tribe has filed a motion for reconsideration of that decision (ECF No. 18), re-emphasizing the Tribe’s position that its tribal sovereign immunity bars the instant lawsuit, and asking again that the Court dismiss the claims brought by Plaintiff Douglas J. Luckerman. For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion for reconsideration is DENIED.
Earlier, the federal court remanded the case to tribal court for exhaustion purposes, post here. Other lower court materials here and here.
Here are the materials in Luckerman v. Narragansett Indian Tribe (D. R.I.):
8-1 Narragansett Motion to Dismiss
Prior post here.
Here are the materials in this pending matter over an alleged $1.1 million in attorney fees:
Narrangansett Motion to Dismiss
Luckerman Opposition/Motion to Remand
Narrangansett Reply + Sachem Affidavit
News coverage here.
Here are the materials in State of Missouri v. Webb (E.D. Mo.):
DCT Order Remanding Mo. Complaint to State Court
Here are the materials in Manoukian v. Harrah’s (S.D. Cal.):
Here are the materials in Muhammad v. Comanche Nation Casino (W.D. Okla.):
DCT Order Denying Muhammad Motion to Remand
Muhammad Response to Motion to Dismiss
Comanche Reply re Motion to Dismiss