Asked and Answered on Lansing Casino Litigation

Featuring “Steve” Matthew Fletcher. Here.

An excerpt:

Thorpe: What is likely to be the next step in this process and when might it take place?

Fletcher: The next step is to litigate the Section 9 question; that is, whether it applies at all because of MILCSA and, if so, whether it forecloses the fee to trust application. I was surprised that Judge Jonker shut down Sault Tribe this early in the process, but it really hurts the tribe. Had Sault Tribe put in their application, the federal government is a party. And especially if Interior took the land into trust, suddenly the United States is a defendant, and they’re much more difficult to defeat than a mere Indian tribe. And no one is better suited to know the implications of an injunction at this early date than Judge Jonker, with all his experience litigating against the United States in Indian gaming cases.

Thorpe: If you were a betting man, what would you say are the odds of the Lansing casino ever being built, at least be the current proposed ownership team?

Fletcher: Flip a coin. Sault Tribe, because of its advantageous position as a result of MILCSA, has the best chance of any tribe. But the Section 9 problem may shut it all down. Moreover, all it takes is one rider in an Interior appropriations bill to undercut that provision.

Saginaw Chippewa and Nottawaseppi Huron Potawatomi Chairs Op/Ed on Lansing Casino

Here.

LSJ Article about Lansing Casino Lawsuit

Here.

GRAND RAPIDS — A federal judge Wednesday said he could decide within 30 days whether to allow Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette to halt a proposed Lansing casino.

U.S. District Judge Robert Jonker announced the timeline after attorneys from the state and the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians argued in a Grand Rapids courtroom about whether Schuette’s six-count lawsuit, filed in September, should be dismissed.

Earlier coverage here.

Second Update in Michigan’s Suit against Proposed Sault Tribe Lansing Casino

Here are the new materials in State of Michigan v. Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians (W.D. Mich.):

Michigan Reply in Support of Motion for PI

Michigan Response to SSM Motion to Dismiss

Nottawaseppi Huron Band of Potawatomi Indians filings:

2012-12-21 Amicus Brief with Exs.

2012-12-21 Memorandum in supportof Motion to file an amicus brief

2012-12-21 Motion to file an amicus brief

Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe filings:

motionforleavetofile&brief

sagchipamicus

exhibitssagchip

Previous materials are here (complaint and motion for PI) and here (Sault Tribe’s responsive pleadings).

Update in Michigan’s Suit against Sault Tribe and Lansing Casino Proposal

The tribe has moved to dismiss and to oppose the State’s request for a preliminary injunction.

Sault Tribe Motion to Dismiss

Sault Tribe Response to Motion for PI

The complaint is here.

News coverage is here.

Update in Sault Tribe Lansing Casino Proposal — Update to the Update

The City transferred the land to the Sault Tribe (here). Nothing all that terribly exciting — a chance to show off before the cameras.

In anticipation of today’s 11AM press conference at the Lansing Center (Casino Project Moves Forward – ADVISORY), casino opponents have issued the following preemptive comments:

Attribute the following statement to James Nye, coalition spokesman, for the Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe and Nottawaseppi Huron Band of Potawatomi:

“For over a decade, the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe has unsuccessfully pursued off-reservation casinos hundreds of miles from its reservation. These efforts have been rejected by the U.S. Congress, the State of Michigan, and the U.S. Department of Interior.

“People should not be fooled; this latest effort to build a casino in Lansing is just another loser. The Sault Tribe has argued that under the Michigan Indian Land Claims Settlement Act it can build a casino anywhere in the United States. That conflicts with federal law, and it violates the Tribe’s state gaming compact.

“We will continue to aggressively fight this ill-conceived casino at the federal and state level, and in the courts. We are very confident that this effort will fail just like the Tribe’s past efforts.”

State of Michigan Sues Sault Tribe over Lansing Casino Proposal

Here are the materials in State of Michigan v. Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians (W.D. Mich.):

Complaint

State Motion PI

State Brief PI

State Brief PI Ex A Compact

State Brief PI Ex B Resolution

State Brief PI Ex C CDA

State Brief PI Ex D Letter

State Brief PI Ex E Web page

State Brief PI Ex F Gaming Ordinance

Sault Tribe Membership Approves Lansing Casino Proposal

Here.

An excerpt:

The Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians voted 3,947 to 2,311, or 63 percent to 37 percent, throughout the past month on plans for the Kewadin Lansing casino, which the tribe would own and operate adjacent to the Lansing Center. Voting was conducted by mailed ballots and closed Thursday, when results were tallied.

Lansing Casino Proposal Investors Named

Here, via Pechanga.

From the article:

Early on in the meeting, Lansing City Council President Brian Jeffries asked City Attorney Brig Smith for more information regarding the investors in Lansing Future LLC, the developer contracted by the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians to finance the casino.

“I have an issue in terms of knowing who the developer is,” Jeffries said.

Smith then introduced Bill Martines, managing director of Lansing Future LLC, who assured the committee that his group wasn’t intentionally trying to cloak itself in secrecy, and listed every investor in Lansing Future.

Besides Martines, president of All Day Interactive, the other investors in the group are Jerry Campbell, CEO of HomeBancorp; Robert Liggett, Jr., owner of the Big Boy Restaurant chain; John Krasula of Decision Consultants; Winfield Cooper, a Flint-based commercial mortgage broker; Mike Garavaglia, a special counsel to Mortgage Investors Corp., and The Sovereignty Group, comprised of Lansing-based lawyer Richard McLellan and Bill Cross Jr.

McLellan joined The Sovereignty Group two weeks ago, after telling media he was not involved in Lansing Future or the casino project. He was not involved in the group until after he made the comments, he said.