Here are the Tenth Circuit briefs so far in State of Oklahoma v. Hobia:
Brief Amicus Curiae State of NM (filed 1-25-13) (W1843673)
State of Michigan Amicus Brief
Filed Brief of the Appellee (1-25-13) (W1843503)
Lower court materials here.
Here are the Tenth Circuit briefs so far in State of Oklahoma v. Hobia:
Brief Amicus Curiae State of NM (filed 1-25-13) (W1843673)
State of Michigan Amicus Brief
Filed Brief of the Appellee (1-25-13) (W1843503)
Lower court materials here.
Here are the materials in Thlopthlocco Tribal Town v. Stidham (N.D. Okla.), a case involving the authority of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation courts’ authority to hear internal government disputes of the Thlopthlocco Tribal Town:
DCT Order Granting Stidham Motion
Exh. 1 Thlopthlocco Tribal Town v. Anderson Complaint
Exh. 2 Thlopthlocco Tribal Town App for Interlocutory Appeal
Exh. 3 Thlopthlocco Tribal Town App for Mandamus
Exh. 5 Thlopthlocco Tribal Town Conditional Motion to Dismiss
Thlopthlocco Tribal Town Motion for PI
Thlopthlocco Tribal Town Response to Motion to Dismiss
Stidham Response to Motion for PI
Thlopthlocco Tribal Town Reply
Here are the materials in Eastern Shawnee Tribe v. Douthitt (N.D. Okla.):
DCT Order Denying CIO Motion to Dismiss
An excerpt from the opinion:
Now before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Brief in Support (Dkt. # 16). Defendants argue that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this case because plaintiff is asking the Court to resolve an internal tribal dispute. They also assert that they have not waived their sovereign immunity from suit and that plaintiff’s claims should be dismissed. Plaintiff responds that it is asking the Court to determine whether the Court of Indian Offenses for the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma had jurisdiction to decide an election dispute, and this is a federal question that can be decided by this Court. They also argue that defendants are not shielded from suit by the doctrine of sovereign immunity.
Here are the additional materials in State of Oklahoma v. Hobia (N.D. Okla.):
Hobia Motion for Reconsideration
Oklahoma Opposition to Reconsideration Motion
Hobia Reply in Reconsideration Motion
DCT Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration
DCT Order Granting Modification of Injunction
Our prior post on this case is here.
Here is the complaint in Feldman, Franden, Woodard, and Farris v. MCZ Development Corp. (N.D. Okla.):
Here are the materials in Harris v. Muscogee (Creek) Nation (N.D. Okla.):
Here is the amended complaint in Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v. Nash (N.D. Okla.):
Cherokee nation vs nash 4 23 2012 Cherokee filing
From the motion for leave to amend:
The proposed Amended Complaint by the Cherokee Nation does not change the original parties, nor add causes of action. It changes the cause of action from a focus upon federal abrogation of the Treaty, to a focus on interpretation of the Treaty language as it was meant by the parties at the time, and as later interpreted by federal statute and cases.
Here are the materials in State of Oklahoma v. Hobia (N.D. Okla.):
[105] Opinion Order DenyingMTDs. Filed. 04-26-12 (W1686451)
Town Corporation Motion to Dismiss
The complaint and the still pending motion for injunction from the State are here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.