Here:
Northern District of Oklahoma
Federal Court Declines to Dismiss Tribal Election Dispute Question
Here are the materials in Eastern Shawnee Tribe v. Douthitt (N.D. Okla.):
DCT Order Denying CIO Motion to Dismiss
An excerpt from the opinion:
Now before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Brief in Support (Dkt. # 16). Defendants argue that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this case because plaintiff is asking the Court to resolve an internal tribal dispute. They also assert that they have not waived their sovereign immunity from suit and that plaintiff’s claims should be dismissed. Plaintiff responds that it is asking the Court to determine whether the Court of Indian Offenses for the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma had jurisdiction to decide an election dispute, and this is a federal question that can be decided by this Court. They also argue that defendants are not shielded from suit by the doctrine of sovereign immunity.
Update in Broken Arrow Casino Litigation: Reconsideration Denied; Injunction Modified
Here are the additional materials in State of Oklahoma v. Hobia (N.D. Okla.):
Hobia Motion for Reconsideration
Oklahoma Opposition to Reconsideration Motion
Hobia Reply in Reconsideration Motion
DCT Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration
DCT Order Granting Modification of Injunction
Our prior post on this case is here.
Lawyers for Kialegee Tribal Town Broken Arrow Casino Developer Sue their Client
Here is the complaint in Feldman, Franden, Woodard, and Farris v. MCZ Development Corp. (N.D. Okla.):
Final Trial Order in State of Oklahoma v. Hobia (Broken Arrow Casino)
Slip and Fall Suit against Muscogee Casino Dismissed in Federal Court after Removal from State Court
Here are the materials in Harris v. Muscogee (Creek) Nation (N.D. Okla.):
Amended Cherokee Nation Complaint in Freedmen Suit
Here is the amended complaint in Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v. Nash (N.D. Okla.):
Cherokee nation vs nash 4 23 2012 Cherokee filing
From the motion for leave to amend:
The proposed Amended Complaint by the Cherokee Nation does not change the original parties, nor add causes of action. It changes the cause of action from a focus upon federal abrogation of the Treaty, to a focus on interpretation of the Treaty language as it was meant by the parties at the time, and as later interpreted by federal statute and cases.
Federal Court Rejects Immunity Defense in Kialegee Tribal Town/Broken Arrow Casino Suit
Here are the materials in State of Oklahoma v. Hobia (N.D. Okla.):
[105] Opinion Order DenyingMTDs. Filed. 04-26-12 (W1686451)
Town Corporation Motion to Dismiss
The complaint and the still pending motion for injunction from the State are here.
Federal Court Dismisses Trust Breach Claim by Osage Headright Beneficiaries
Here are the materials in Fletcher v. United States (N.D. Okla.):
DCT Order Dismissing Third Amended Complaint
Our prior post on this case (from 2009) is here.
Materials in Kialegee Tribal Town Casino Suit
Here are the materials so far in State of Oklahoma v. Hobia (N.D. Okla.):
State Brief for Preliminary Injunction
Hobia Response in Opposition to PI Motion
State DCT Order re Prime Ground Lease
Our previous post is here. The Tulsa World is also collecting docs here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.